Tuesday, December 27, 2011

When chimps collide

"Five chimpanzees were placed in a cage. In the cage was a set of stairs; and above the stairs a bunch of bananas hanging by a rope. After a while one of the chimps started up the stairs to get the bananas. As he did this all the chimps in the cage were blasted with cold water and ran to a corner. A little while later another of the chimps went up the stairs for the bananas. Once more all the chimps were drenched with cold water. Later, another chimp started up the stairs but on seeing this the other four chimps attacked him. The next day one of the five was taken out and replaced with a new chimp. The new chimp saw the bananas and started up the stairs but was attacked by the others. On the third day another of the original five chimps was taken from the cage and replaced by a new one. He too tried to reach the bananas but was immediately attacked by the other four - even the one that'd been attacked himself the day before. This went on until none of the original five chimps were left. By now none of them had ever been sprayed with water, but they'd still attack any chimp that tried to climb the stairs. Why? Because for them that's the way it had always been."

Thursday, December 15, 2011

New lies for old

“If you plug it they will buy.”

Funny that The Incogman should write the linked post when he did. I watched the NBC Nightly J/News this pm. I almost never watch the j/news, especially national j/news and especially the NBC Nightly J/News, but zapped over from the local weather. Voila! All we’ve learned about the Jew run media circus was there in living color. The sly, sidewise propaganda. The bandwagon agenda. The subtle insinuation. Mockery of those in disfavor. The floated idea.  Nothing about feces though.... Maybe they’re saving that for tomorrow!

By this point in time it's just so apparent and predictable. You know ahead of time what angles and spin to expect - and even the buzzwords the spewing heads will eject. Tonight’s news had a story about a new, man made virus with both major lethality and communicability. Viruses usually come one way or the other, but not both. You realize they’re creating a run up for a pandemic - or something similar they can try to blame on Iran. It’s become too obvious for those who have eyes to see. A US senator once told me I was one of the most cynical people he’d ever met, but the truth is you can make very accurate predictions on the basis of Jew-wise cynicism.

Somewhere down the line the Jews figured out the great value of propaganda, and have used it skillfully ever since. They’ve also been skillful at keeping the knowledge of this under wraps. Still, we can be sure of one thing: in the end they always screw up. Their native hubris invariably leads them into disaster. Having The Almighty for an adversary they’re certain to fail… though not without taking many others with them. Probably a deal they won't refuse.

“If the blind lead the blind….”


Another very informative piece from the Incogman site:


Wednesday, September 28, 2011


This just in from the American Family Association - a Christian group espousing conservative views: Vanderbilt University in Nashville, TN is an elite research university with an emphasis on the medical sciences. If you visit their web site they blather on about the usual, politically correct, Masonic ideals: "...equality, compassion, and excellence in all endeavors...." Secretly, of course, its leaders are anti-Christians who're counting the minutes till they can open the gates for the lions again.

Most universities and all state universities are besides themselves in their love of things homosexual - and forced acceptance of this perversion is now in full stride in academia. Vanderbilt is just one of many examples I could point to. Homosexualism always insinuates itself under the banner of "equal rights" - which invariably become articles of coercion once the courts start making their rulings.

Yet, even after 80 years of non-stop liberal propaganda most people are still able to recognize homosexuality for the aberration it is, forcing the plutocrats to ramp up their efforts to impose it on us by diktat. Ain't democracy great!

"A nation of sheep gets a government of wolves."


"Vanderbilt University has placed four Christian student groups on "provisional status" after a university review found them to be in non-compliance with the school's nondiscrimination policy. If they remain in non-compliance, the student Christian groups risk being shut down.

"Vanderbilt says the student organizations cannot require that leaders share the Christian groups' beliefs, goals and values. Carried to its full extent, it means an atheist could lead a Christian group, a man a woman's group, a Jew a Muslim group or vice versa.

"Last year, an openly gay undergrad at Vanderbilt complained he was kicked out of a Christian fraternity. As a result, the school took action against five religious groups and said they violated Vanderbilt's nondiscrimination policy. All were placed on provisional status.

"Among the groups threatened with shut down is the Christian Legal Society because "Each officer is expected to lead Bible studies, prayer and worship at chapter meetings." CLS President Justin Gunter said, "We come together to do things that Christians do together. Pray, and have Bible studies."

"The school says, however, that if the Christian club requires leaders to be a Christian and espouse Christianity, it can be shut down."


Saturday, September 10, 2011

911: the lie that will not die

The direction from which the US government says Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, after striking the light poles. Compare this to the Black box data (video below) and what the witnesses reported in the Vimeo video. Not only does the initial damage to the facade not match the plane (as seen above), but also the "angle of attack" is wrong. Someone is lying... BIG-time!

Quite possibly a smaller, unmanned aerial vehicle or cruise missile was on a parallel course, slightly behind the commercial aircraft that witnesses were busy watching, or maybe a previously positioned explosive was detonated at the precise moment. I know that sounds crazy, but it is easily within the realm of current technology to have done precisely that.

Flight 77 Black Box data released from the NTSB shows it could not have struck light poles or the Pentagon because it was on a different path and 480′ too high (and data just happens to end 1 second before supposed "impact"). The NTSB refuses to answer any questions about these discrepancies. This means: The data was falsified or 2) something else happened that day. Go here: Pilots for 911 Truth for more info and a video on them trying to get answers but being snubbed by the NTSB.

Watch the video below on the supposed terrorist attack on the Pentagon to see evidence that shows beyond a doubt that a carefully contrived false flag event was staged by elements within the US government on 9/11. The video is 81 minutes long, but absolutely well worth every minute of your time to watch.

It persuasively shows that the official version of Flight 77's approach was always a complete fabrication. What is more startling, is that the plane must have pulled up over the Pentagon right before the explosion... which was the product of something else.

Note that the NTSB provided "Black Box" data (below) supports the witnesses' accounts and refutes what the government and traitorous media say was the direction of Flight 77. The downed light poles are a complete contradiction to this data and tell you that: 1) The NTSB data was fabricated; or, 2) The path of the jet was NOT what they say it was. Those light poles are a GIANT piece of evidence that something devious is going on. Watch the video:

NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK from Citizen Investigation Team on Vimeo.



Lots of Looties

The PC cult says you're a racist if you laugh at Lootie. But look at that face! Lootie's clearly someone you could have a good time with and who'd happily share some of his ill-gotten gain with you. The problem here isn't so much the Lootie's of the world - it's the liberals of the world... who btw really DO believe Blacks are inferior to Whites. Those bug eyed bedwetters are always pissing a river; but notice that it's always in someone else's bed.


Friday, September 9, 2011

Jewish math

6,000,000-1 = 3-5 years

Mitt Romney@12%+msm = 55%
Ron Paul@55%+msm = 12%

<1,000,000+bs = 6,000,000

Holocaust = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Monday, August 22, 2011

Heebs trying to pull a fast one over on us

The heebs are at it again! Now, they’re trying to sneak through HR 2589, an “anti-boycott act” that’ll make it a Federal crime (up to $1,000,000 in fines or 20 years in prison) for an American citizen to organize or partake in a boycott against Israel, and by extension Jews, many of whom hold dual citizenship. This demands a call or email to your Congressman, letting him know in no uncertain terms that Israel is no ally to the US and that you’ll be tracking the progress of this bill on, OpenCongress.org


Sunday, August 21, 2011

Angels of light and darkness

Brother Nathanael Kapner does excellent, hard hitting work on Jewry; but he comes up a pound short on the Christianity part of his ministry.   When I saw him on YouTube: prancing about and  waving a crucifix like a damn fool, it turned me off.  No real Christian would ever do that.   Not even a protestant.
Lots of claimed "Christian" sites seem to be Mossad psyop fronts.  John Hagee's is one of the more obvious ones.   I used to visit a "Catholic" site called "Holy Smoke" which addressed Catholic themes from a seemingly orthodox perspective.  The site and its regulars championed the Tridentine mass, were down on libs and detested the limp wristed Catholic hierarchs in the UK.   But I soon learned all was not as it seemed:  the posters there (pretty much all of them) liked to think JPII was a decent, well intentioned man and pope - albeit too soft on liberals.   But they *loved* Benedict XVI - believing in spite of all the evidence to the contrary that Die Ratzinger would cultivate orthodoxy in a Church gone to weeds. The facts testify of other things: whatever else they may or may not be,  JPII and B16 can scarcely be considered Catholics... let alone popes.
When I began to challenge some of the Smokers on matters of Catholic doctrine which the two "popes" had fudged on, or even denied outright, I was attacked by many of them.   It became clear to me that although they were dressed up as though they were orthodox Catholics, underneath they had on rainbow undies. Their game exposed, jfthoi, I started posting quotes  from popes and saints regarding the Jews.  Man, that really got their blood boiling and I was denounced as though I were the the Anti-Christ  himself... for quoting popes and saints!

Anyway, I mention this because it's clear to me now that if Satan can appear as an angel of light how hard can it be for him to appear as an orthodox Christian?   Brother Nat, whatever else he does right - and he does a lot right - stumbles over an easy hurdle: treating the crucifix with respect.

Continuing my research in this area it became clearer that Satan is active in Christian circles.  No kidding!   Today he's especially active in "conservative", evangelical Christian circles.   War mongering Ziocon-ism draws much of its strength from protestant evangelicals, most of whom dislike liberalism and consider themselves  conservatives, yet who line up to bend over for the Synagogue of Satan no less eagerly than liberals.  Very clever how the devil plays one group - which he created - against another - which he created.  You wouldn't think that disembodied spirits would have much need for shekels.
Whatever one protestant church teaches there's another down the street that denies it; but Catholicism's doctrines are written in stone. This makes it a lot easier for Catholics to recognize heterodoxy.   You just compare what's said today against what's  been said over the past 2,000 years.  Following this line it's perfectly obvious that something's rotten in Rome: the Church today preaches a new Gospel - different from what it's advocated the past 2,000 years.  It's a sly outlook that likes to exploit the ambiguities found in Vatican II statements.   Thus we now have popes kissing the Koran, receiving the mark of Siva, praying at synagogues, issuing joint statements with the Lutherans, inviting voodooists to offer prayers of peace in Catholic churches....   You could go on forever.

Pope Paul VI once lamented, "The smoke of Satan has entered the Church!"   He spoke the truth, but what he didn't say was he was one of the main fissures through which it entered!  Even someone as disgraceful as JPII spoke some excellent and thoroughly orthodox things... then followed up with abject heresies.  Sometimes in the same paragraph!  That's our Catholic world today. 
The devil is still "prowling around looking for whomsoever he might devour."  You'd think his jaws would be growing sore.  The libs we can immediately recognize as fools or phonies, but the "conservative" type Christians, who do and say many good things, bear very close watching.   Some of them may be genuine but it's not a bet you should lightly take.


Monday, August 15, 2011

A hard question

Who am I?

I am behind communism
I am behind radical feminism
I am behind homosexual-ism and "gay marriage"
I am behind multiculturalism
I am behind anti-Christianity
I am behind a one world government

I am the "divider and conquerer"
I am the race baiter and the slave trader
I am censorship
I am anti-gun
I am open borders
I am eminent domain
I am against English as the official language of the government
I am a dual citizen with loyalty not to your nation
I am the reason your daughter has low self esteem and desperately dresses like a whore
I am the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, central banking and big corporate money.
I am usury, fractional reserve lending, world currency and fiat money
I am the MSM, Hollywood, tabloid journalism and pornography
I am the corrupt judicial system that frees the guilty and imprisons the innocent
I am the nation's high end drug dealer
I am the re-writer of history to my advantage
I am the military industrial complex
I am an unregulated nuclear state
I am an international terrorist
I am the WTC '93, OKC '95, 911, the Lavon Affair and the USS Liberty incident
I am "war by way of deception"
I am the aggressor, yet always the victim
I am the eternal radical

I believe that chaos equals cash and that gray equals green
I will defraud your country without conscience or consequence
I legislate from the bench, not from the Constitution
I contrive to make the simplest notion complicated
I succeed when you fail
I have killed more innocents than any others
I am your last, your current and your next war

Who am I?

From Prothink.org

Sunday, August 14, 2011


In the Catholic Church  today we see Jews serving as papal knights! Although nUcHuRcH – of which B16 is a principal architect – goes out of its way to bend over for the ever sinless, ever sinned against, "elder brothers in the faith" (God forbid that one!), it hasn’t always been so. At one time the popes understood Jewry very well.   Still, there'd always been a steady flow of converts from the Synagogue; and despite what Wikipedia's hordes of Jewish "editors" would have you think, few of them were forced to convert - which is forbidden by canon law in any instance.  

Though many of the Jews who converted to Catholicism were sincere, a large minority, at least, looked back affectionately at the Synagogue. These became (and still are) the object of a fanatic re-proselytizing program by the Jews. In Spain particularly, the Jews and crypto-Jews became such a problem for the monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella that they were finally forced to give them the boot. To this day the Jews still whine about it... and plot their revenge.

In today’s Vatican though "converts" feel no pressing need to hide their true allegiances.  All of the sudden it seems Jews get to heaven too.  Still, quite a few Jews who’ve converted over the ages were honest seekers and luminaries. Saul of Tarsus being the most celebrated. Then there were Fathers Ratisbonne and Mortaro.  Others like Bernard Nathanson and Mortimer Adler are more recent adornments.

So, what can we do about the den of judaizing snakes inhabiting the Vatican today?  Well, we need to pray more for one.  We can also write our bishop or even the Pope and tell him we're witholding our tithes so long as nUcHuRcH continues to deny and betray the Traditions and articles of the Faith.


Friday, August 12, 2011

The Incogman

I used to wonder about the Incogman, “Is he a Mossad asset running a deep cover operation?” Or, “Is he a rogue Jew, playing one of their jewvenile, ‘I’m so much smarter than everyone else… tee… hee… hee….’ games?” But I gotta say it: if he’s running a stealth Jew joint, he’s better than good at it.

Jews like working both sides of the street, so it comes as no surprise they’d open up “antisemitic” websites as part of their depraved nefariousness. They’re good liars (always have been) but eventually the truth outs them. And much to their chagrin it always does. People are wiseing up to their Zio-lies, their holo-lies, their fetzen-lies…. Like a juggler who takes on too many plates their lies eventually come crashing down on them.

I’ve come to the conclusion that although he’s a strange cat, Incogman is a bonafide White man. Why so? 1. His message has remained consistent over time. No subtle shape shifting; and though I disagree with some of his hasbarat accusations, most if not all of those who got spamblinka’d deserved it. 2. He rarely asks for money. If he were really a Jew there’d be no end to that. 3. He hasn’t banned me. If he were really a Jew I’d have been bounced by now.

Based on these reasons I’ve got no problem buying him a cuppa now and then.


Thursday, August 11, 2011

The hitchiker's guide to heresies

"All heresies begin below the waist."

Adoptionism: Eighth century onwards. "The Hispanicus error". The theory that there were two Jesus': Jesus/God and Jesus/Man. Jesus/God was God's natural son whereas Jesus/man at His baptism became God's son by adoption. A reprise of the Nestorian heresy. Adoptionism arose in Spain in an area still under Muslim rule and was regarded favorably by the caliphs. Whereas Nestorianism divided Jesus into two natures, Adoptionism divided Jesus into two *sons* - one natural and one adopted. Opposed by Charlemagne it failed to outlive its two principal hereseiarchs, Elipandus and Felix (though it experienced a qualified revival with Pierre Abelard's "Neo-adoptionist" theology in the twelfth century).

Albigensianism/Catharism/Bulgarism: Twelfth through thirteenth centuries. "Good God, bad God." Dualistic cult that spread from its Zoroastrian roots in Persia and followed the trade routes westward into Europe via Bulgaria, becoming especially popular in southern France. The "good God" was represented by Jesus, who came to the world in spirit, not in the flesh, to teach man the way to free himself from the imprisonment of matter. Matter was viewed as an evil created by the "bad" God of the Old Testament, aka the demiurge, "Rex Mundi". The Cathars attacked the Catholic sacramental system, the priesthood and any idea of an institutional church. They claimed the New Testament,especially the Gospel of John as their only Biblical authority. They refused to swear oaths, opposed the death penalty, and because they viewed the material world as evil, refrained from eating meat, dairy products or anything else conceived through procreation, for these were viewed as snares of the demiurge. This scrupulosity extended to marriage as well and the procreation of children was considered evil. Men and women would live together, but shun marriage. To give some idea of the situation: all someone accused of being a Cathar had to do to get the charges dropped was show he was married. Their sexual proclivities were suspect as well, given that Cathars viewed procreation as evil. This fueled accusations of sodomy. The British slur "bugger" (bulgar) traces its name to them. The Cathars had a spiritual caste system of "initiates", "believers" and "the perfect". They believed in reincarnation, holding that one became a "perfect" by stages and that this sometimes necessitated multiple lives. It was finally exterminated, in France at least, by the Albigensian Crusade of the thirteenth century.

Anglicanism: 1535 onward. Anti-papal, anti-monastic and iconoclastic sect that arose over the failure  of the English king, Henry VIII, to convince the Pope to grant him an annulment so that he could marry his mistress. Over the centuries Anglicanism has generally steered closer to Catholicism than any other protestant sect. The reason for this is that Henry always considered himself a true Catholic and kept many of the external practices of Catholicism - albeit gutting them of any sacramental efficacy. He replaced the Pope with himself as head of the English church, killed or replaced all those who resisted his takeover, then seized monastic lands and properties for himself and his supporters. Likewise, the Churches were looted of their valuables under the guise of restoring "apostolic simplicity". Anglicanism has always followed in the trane of the British state, and rises or falls depending on its military successes. Today, the Queen of England is the head of the Anglican church.  During the American Revolutionary War, the former Anglican aristocracy of the colonies adopted a modified form of Anglicanism, called "Episcopalianism" that replaced the king as leader of the church with episcopal diocese' headed, in theory though not in practice, by a General Convention.

Arianism: Fourth to eighth century anti-Trinitarian creed - "There was a time when He was not." Claimed that Jesus was a created being, not begotten and not really God. Arrived at this idea by a subtle twisting of the Greek term "homoousia" (same substance) into "homoiosia" (similar substance). Jesus became the "Son of God" but remained a lesser being than God the Father. Likewise, the Holy Spirit was demoted from being the Third Person of the Trinity into a benign force representing the power of God. Arianism became popular among the upper ranks of Roman society and flowed downward accordingly. Famously decried by St. Jerome: "The world woke up and groaned to find itself Arian." Its greatest opponent was St. Athanasisus. Extinct by the eighth century, yet elements of it resurfaced in the aftermath of the Protestant rebellion.

Docetism: First century onward. "Sprit good, matter bad." Monad v. demiurge belief that matter is evil. Therefore, as matter is bad Jesus was purely spirit and his physical body was merely an illusion. Likewise the crucifixion was an illusion as, being a spirit, Jesus could not and did not die. The body was viewed as a prison created by the demiurge to prevent man from realizing his divine origins. Similar to Marcionism in it's beliefs and consequent logic.

Donatism: More a schism than a heresy, the Donatists were a rigorist sect which held the valid administration of the sacraments depended on the "holiness" of the priest or bishop administering them. This question arose after the persecution of Diocletian (303-5) in which numerous priests and bishops handed over their holy books and even apostasized rather than face martyrdom. On the accession of the Emperor Constantine and the issuance of the Edict of Toleration, these men often sought to re-claim their old positions. However, the Donatists held that the apostasizng priests and bishops having abandoned them when in danger, had lost their sacramental faculties forever. After much debate it was decided that the office of the priest and not the character of the priest were what validated the sacraments; and that, "The Church is a church of sinners no less than saints." Thus, the apostasizing priests and bishops were allowed, after a suitable period of penance, to resume their old positions. Having lost the theological debate, the Donatists refused to accept the verdict and subsequently found themselves persecuted by the Roman authorities.

Gnosticism: Ancient to present. Not a Christian heresy per se, but a religious sentiment of a mysterious "secret knowledge" that found, and still finds, expression in many traditions, including paganism. Notable examples would by the mystery religions of Ancient Egypt and Rome, the medieval Cathars and today's Freemasonry, Theosophy and Kabbalah.

Lollardy: Mid-14th century onward. Confined to England. Pre-protestant sect that arose in the wake of Oxford theologian, John Wycliffe's anti-clerical claims. Lollardy appealed across class lines in English society and greatly pre-figured Calvinism, which followed it 150 years later. Though they expressed a chaos of various theories, Lollards, were generally an anti-Church, anti-papal, anti-hierarchical, anti-sacerdotal, anti-monastic, iconoclastic, sola scriptura cult. Lollard "priests", who were usually laymen, wandered about the English countryside, preaching their new gospel to whomever would listen. It was driven underground when the English kings finally recognized its implicit anti-societal message. The underground Lollards feigned Catholicism but continued secretly in their forbidden mysteries. These emerged from hiding during the Anglican rebellion of the 1500's and lent their support to Henry.

Marcionism: Second to fifth century AD. A Christian, semi-gnostic sect which held Jesus is the saviour of mankind but that the Old Testament God of the Hebrews was the "demiurge", a lesser being who had created the material world and was therefore the creator of evil. This demiurge had set himself up against the creator of pure spirit - the "monad". Accordingly Jesus was not a human being but rather a spirit being - sent by the monad to teach men the way to free themselves from the earthly grip of the evil demiurge.

Monophysitism: Third century to the present. The Christological belief that Christ has two natures, divine and human, united in one person. It had two slightly different permutations: Apollinarism - which held that, while Christ possessed a normal human body and emotions, the Divine Logos had essentially taken the place of his "nous", or mind; and Eutychianism -which held that the human and divine natures of Christ were fused into one new single (mono) nature. It is Eutychianism that became the dominant controversy. Anathematized at the Council of Chalcedon and politically opposed by the Emperor Justinian, it faded from the centers of Roman civilization but survived at the margins of the Empire and survives to this day in communities in Egypt, Syria, Armenia and Ethiopia.

Montanism: Second century cult that sprang up around the person of Montanus, a recent convert from paganism and self proclaimed prophet. Montanus travelled throughout the Roman province of Phrygia (what is now Turkey) and, with the help of two female assistants, preached and prophesied to the locals. Montanus claimed to be receiving direct revelations from God and for a while successfully spread his ideas throughout the wider Roman world, even entraining Tertullian.

Nestorianism/Adoptionism: Early fourth century onwards. A doctrine advanced by the Patriarch Nestor of Constantinople that there were two Jesus' - one human the other divine; and these were only loosely joined. Denied the Virgin Mary's title "Mother of God", claiming she was the "Mother of Christ" only. Although he protested that he was wholly orthodox, Nestor was anathematized as heretical at the Council of Ephesus and was deposed as a bishop and excommunicated. However, Nestor's teachings have survived to the present, in varying degree, in Christian communities scattered about the Muslim world.

Nicolaitanism: First century Christian heretical sect of undetermined origins. Mentioned in the Apocalypse (2:6-15) as being a sect whose practices were detested by Christ. The Nicolaitans quickly disappeared from the scene. It was believed by later Christian writers that they practiced some form of marital immorality: either having multiple wives or sharing their wives with one another.

Pelagianism: Mid fourth to fifth centuries. "You can be good without God!" Pelagius taught that Adam and Eve's sin was only that of setting a bad example; this denied the doctrine of original sin. He held that sin is not something native to man, but is a learned behavior passed down from generation to generation since Adam and Eve and that it can be overcome by willpower - aided by divine grace but not its product as a man's will is his own.

Protestantism: Sixteenth century onwards. Heresy that began in Germany over widespread resentment of the Italo-centric policies of the Borgia popes. Announced in force by Martin Luther, A German priest and theologian, who was angered by the so called "sale" of indulgences that Pope Leo X announced in order to build St. Peter's Cathedral. Known popularly as the "Protestant Reformation", it was in fact a rebellion. Luther claimed the Catholic Church had gone wide astray of its mandate and wanted to bring it back to "Biblical basics". His theology was based upon: 1. "Sola scriptura" - the Bible as the sole rule of faith and authority. 2. "Sola fide" - one is saved by faith alone. 3. The universal priesthood of all believers. Luther received protection and patronage from powerful German princes, whose favors he cultivated, and who were themselves angry with Rome and looking for a quick way to fatten their treasuries. Almost simultaneously a similar reaction was taking place in Switzerland under a French lawyer named Jean Cauvin (John Calvin). Though Luther gets most of the credit, most of what is recognizably protestant today gets its colors from Calvin not him. Whereas Luther sailed a course fairly close to Catholicism, Calvin set out to explore new seas. Luther and Calvin started out on friendly terms but soon began to quarrel and anathematized one another. Other heresiarchs quickly arose in their wake: Zwingli, Melanchthon, Henry Tudor, John Knox.... The list is endless. There are over 33,000 various protestant sects in the world today, each claiming the others are wrong and anathematizing their claimed errors and heresies. The only thing they can be said to hold in common is that there seems to be some sort of god....

Waldensianism: Twelfth century to the present. Taught that the Bible is the sole rule of authority (sola scriptura) and, like the Donatists before them, that the validity of the sacraments depends on the worthiness of the priest. They refused to take oaths and renounced the death penalty - which was taken by the Inquisition as de facto proof of heresy. Sporadic, half-hearted persecutions failed to eliminate them. Following the protestant rebellion they were mostly absorbed into the new sects, though some self proclaimed "Waldensian" churches say they are descended from the original Waldenses.


Tuesday, August 9, 2011

How'd your Congressman vote?

The House voted to pass an amended senate bill (S 627) that supposedly will cut spending – but still raised the debt ceiling. “Conservatives” hailed it as a victory saying it denied Obama all he wanted and forced budget cuts on the Federal government. Dem’s all voted no. Not because they are opposed to spending cuts per se, but because they saw an opportunity to shift the blame for being a bunch of heartless scrooges on to repubs. The better to doop their ignorant constituents....

So, another cheap shell game posing as the Monte Carlo Casino has managed to dazzle the peasants again. But we here know there’ll be no substantial spending cuts. The national debt will continue to rise to the "ceiling" and beyond.


S 627 – Budget Control Act of 2011


Barton (TX)
Bass (NH)
Bishop (UT)
Bono Mack
Brady (TX)
Burton (IN)
Coffman (CO)
Davis (KY)
Duncan (TN)
Franks (AZ)
Gingrey (GA)
Graves (MO)
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Hastings (WA)
Herrera Beutler
Huizenga (MI)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, Sam
King (NY)
Kinzinger (IL)
Lewis (CA)
Lungren, Daniel E.
McCarthy (CA)
McMorris Rodgers
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Murphy (PA)
Poe (TX)
Price (GA)
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Ross (FL)
Ryan (WI)
Scott, Austin
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Thompson (PA)
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
Young (IN)


Bass (CA)
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Broun (GA)
Brown (FL)
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Clarke (MI)
Clarke (NY)
Connolly (VA)
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
Donnelly (IN)
Duncan (SC)
Frank (MA)
Graves (GA)
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Hastings (FL)
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
King (IA)
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Lewis (GA)
Lofgren, Zoe
McCarthy (NY)
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Murphy (CT)
Pastor (AZ)
Pingree (ME)
Price (NC)
Ross (AR)
Rothman (NJ)
Ryan (OH)
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Scott (SC)
Scott (VA)
Scott, David
Smith (WA)
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Van Hollen
Walsh (IL)
Walz (MN)
Wasserman Schultz
Wilson (FL)
Wilson (SC)

The debt ceiling bill (Motion to Concur in the House Amendment to S. 365 )

Who voted to raise the debt ceiling? You might think finding out how your senator voted on this important matter would, in the age of “government transparency”, be easy. It isn’t.

The msm goes out of its way to not mention the bill number in their stories about it (and others). And they’re loath to list the votes of the whole senate and house. Seems almost like they’re trying to hide something. Yeas were for, and nays against, the measure.


Alphabetical by Senator Name

Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Alexander (R-TN), Yea
Ayotte (R-NH), Nay
Barrasso (R-WY), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Begich (D-AK), Yea
Bennet (D-CO), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Blumenthal (D-CT), Yea
Blunt (R-MO), Yea
Boozman (R-AR), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Brown (D-OH), Yea
Brown (R-MA), Yea
Burr (R-NC), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Casey (D-PA), Yea
Chambliss (R-GA), Nay
Coats (R-IN), Nay
Coburn (R-OK), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Coons (D-DE), Yea
Corker (R-TN), Yea
Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
DeMint (R-SC), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Franken (D-MN), Yea
Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
Hagan (D-NC), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Heller (R-NV), Nay
Hoeven (R-ND), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), Yea
Johanns (R-NE), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Johnson (R-WI), Nay
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kirk (R-IL), Yea
Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
Lee (R-UT), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Manchin (D-WV), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McCaskill (D-MO), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
Merkley (D-OR), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Moran (R-KS), Nay
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Nay
Paul (R-KY), Nay
Portman (R-OH), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Risch (R-ID), Yea
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Rubio (R-FL), Nay
Sanders (I-VT), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shaheen (D-NH), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Tester (D-MT), Yea
Thune (R-SD), Yea
Toomey (R-PA), Nay
Udall (D-CO), Yea
Udall (D-NM), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Nay
Warner (D-VA), Yea
Webb (D-VA), Yea
Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea
Wicker (R-MS), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Yet another antisemitic canard laid to rest....

The "producers" of a movie either represent or are the movie's financial backers. The producers hold the real power in Hollywood; and "executive producers" are the real big money boys. Although they are virtual unknowns to the rest of us, successful Hollywood producers wield much more clout than the actors and directors in their employ. Of course it’s an antisemitic canard to say that Jews run Hollywood… Right?

Pulp Fiction: Sadistic gorefest. Much of Pulp Fiction's action revolves around characters who are in the bathroom or need to use the toilet. Repeated use of the word "nigger" by some of the characters - without censure by the msm. Indeed, it's praised for its "punchy dialogue." Seven Academy Award nominations. Numerous other awards.

Quentin Tarantino .... director and writer

Produced by:

Lawrence Bender .... producer
Danny DeVito .... executive producer
Richard N. Gladstein .... co-executive producer
Michael Shamberg .... executive producer
Stacey Sher .... executive producer
Bob Weinstein .... co-executive producer
Harvey Weinstein .... co-executive producer


Inglourious Basterds: Sadistic, German hating gorefest. Were any other ethnicity so targeted it would have been banned for "inciting racial hatred". Nominated for eight academy awards. Numerous other awards.

Quentin Tarantino .... director and writer

Produced by:

Lawrence Bender .... producer
William Paul Clark .... associate producer
Christoph Fisser .... co-producer (as Cristoph Fisser)
Henning Molfenter .... co-producer
Bruce Moriarty .... associate producer
Lloyd Phillips .... executive producer
Pilar Savone .... associate producer
Erica Steinberg .... executive producer
Bob Weinstein .... executive producer
Harvey Weinstein .... executive producer
Charlie Woebcken .... co-producer (as Carl L. Woebcken)


Sunday, July 31, 2011

Societal collapse is coming. Are you ready?

Patriotnurse has done her homework. Though she doesn't speak of the crime wave that will descend in tandem with the "death waves" - as hordes of ghettoites and others who couldn't survive a week without their gub'ment check, invade the suburbs in a vain effort to stave off extinction.


Monday, July 25, 2011

Know they neighbors

When the financial collapse hits for real - and its going to be bad - the criminal elements in this country will undoubtedly and quickly coalesce to form gangs of freebooters.

These will be tolerated to a degree by the government, as their lawlessness will give the rulers a pretext for enacting oppressive laws: voiding the Constitution and, among other things, confiscating privately owned guns. Taking people's guns away is probably THE lynchpin in the NWO plan. After that, all that follows will be much easier.

Instead of "bugging out" when the stuff finally hits the fan we'd do better stocking up on non-perishable foods; getting to know our neighbors and planning out how to defend our own "hoods" from those who will come: felons and/or Feds.


Saturday, July 23, 2011

Incogman's site attacked... again....

Incogman, the dread "antisemitic" Internet gadfly has had his site vandalized... again.... A year and a day after his first site was purged from Wordpress (in an obvious Jewploy) his new site has disappeared. One could kinda see this coming: the Synagogue never sleeps and they're going after bloggers - even small potatoes like me - in order to censor all criticism.

Jewry's had their sights on Incogman for a long time, utilizing various stratagems to cause him ill, yet he out foxed them. But the rapid growth of White awareness to the Jew peril has forced them to pump up the volume against bloggers like him... and me... and many others too. No doubt about it.

But I'm sure the Incogman will rise from the ashes of this latest setback and resume his place as a guide star in the expanding constellation of Jew-wise people.

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

The Synagogue of Satan - in its own words


The following was compiled by an Internet acquaintance who goes by the name "Al" and who prefers to maintain his anonymity. We discovered one another at Damian Thompson's horrid site "Blowing Smoke", aka "Holy Smoke".  Al has an encyclopedic knowledge of Judaism and has given me many useful suggestions.



"You are *adam* ["man"], but *goyim* [gentiles] are not called *adam*["man"]." Kerithoth 6b

“The seed of the *goyim* is like an animal.” Sanhedrin 74b

“All Gentile children are animals.” Yebamoth 98a

“The best of the gentiles: kill him; the best of snakes: smash its skull; the best of women: is filled with witchcraft*.” Kiddushin 66c The uncensored version of this text appears in *Tractate Soferim* (New York, M. Higer, 1937), 15:7, p. 282. "The best of the gentiles should all be killed.": http://talmudical.blogspot.com/2010/09/truth-about-talmud.html

"...'living soul' designates Israel because they are children of the Almighty, and their souls, which are holy, come from Him. From whence come the souls of other peoples? R[abbi] Eleazar said: 'They obtain souls from those sides of the left which convey impurity, and therefore they are all impure and defile those who have contact with them.'...'living soul' refers to Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and 'cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth,' to the other peoples who are not 'living soul," but who are as we have said." Bereshith 47a

“Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever… their material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews…” Abraham Foxbrunner. *Habad: The Hasidism of Schneur Zalman of Lyady*. Northvale NJ:
Jason Aronson Inc., 1983. Pp. 108-109

"The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species." Rabbi Saadya Grama, Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut JewishSuperiority and the Question of Exile, 2003.

“Souls of non-Jews come entirely from the female part of the Satanic sphere. For this reason souls of non-Jews are called evil.” [Yesaiah Tishbi, Torat ha-Rave-ha-Kelippahnbe-Kabbalat ha-Ari (The Theory of Evil and the Satanic Sphere in Kabbalah) 1942, reprinted 1982] The Messianic age of restoration and redemption (tikkun olam) forecast by the religion of Judaism and spoon-fed to their partisans among the goyim, posits a world restored to universal harmony and justice. That’s the cover story, anyway. But the truth it is somewhat more macabre, as Tishby relates: “… the presence of Israel among the nations mends the world, but not the nations of the world…. It does not bring the nations closer to holiness, but rather it extracts the holiness from them and thereby destroys their ability to exist… [T]he purpose of the full redemption is to destroy the vitality of all the peoples.”], Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN 13: 9780970378453, pp.774-775

"... the explanation of the matter, [is to be found] in light of what Rabbi Chayim Vital wrote in Shaar HaKedushah (and in Etz Chayim, Portal 5, ch. 2) — that every Jew, whether righteous or wicked, possesses two souls, as it is written, “And neshamot (souls) which I have made. ... The second, uniquely Jewish, soul is truly “a part of G-d above, The souls of the nations of the world (the Gentiles), however, emanate from the other, unclean kelipot which contain no good whatever, as is written in Etz Chayim, Portal 40, ch. 3, that all the good that (Gentiles) do, is done out of selfish motives. So the Gemara comments on the verse, “The kindness of (Gentiles) is sin” — that all the charity and kindness done by (Gentiles) of the world is only for their self-glorification..." (Chapters 1 and 2) The lower category consists of three completely unclean and evil kelipot, containing no good whatever... From them flow and are derived the souls of all the nations of the world (Gentiles), and the sustaining force of their bodies. Also derived from these kelipot are the souls of all living creatures that are unclean and forbidden to be eaten, and the sustaining force of their bodies." Tanya, Chapter 6: 

"Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered father of the messianic tendency in Jewish fundamentalism, said, 'The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews - all of them in all different levels — is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.' Rabbi Kook's entire teaching... is followed devoutly by, among others, those who have led the settler movement in the occupied West Bank... According to the ideologies which underlie Gush Emunum, the militant West Bank settlers group, and Hasidism, non-Jews have 'satanic souls'... Members of Gush Emunum argue that 'what appears to be confiscation of Arab-owned land for subsequent settlement by Jews is in reality not an act of stealing but one of sanctification.' From their perspective the land is redeemed by being transferred from the satanic to the divine sphere... Common to both the Talmud and the Halacha, Orthodox religious law, is a differentiation between Jews and non-Jews. The highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mandel Schneerson, who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence in Israel as well [and proclaimed himself messiah], explained that 'The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: 'Let us differentiate.' Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of 'let us differentiate' between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of all nations of the world.'" Allan C. Brownfield, "It Is Time to Confront the Exclusionary Ethnocentrism," Issues of the American Council for Judaism, Winter 2000, cited in Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, pp.365-366.

“Even when we seek revenge, it is important to make one thing clear – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs. The Talmud states that if gentiles rob Israel of silver they will pay it back in gold, and all that is taken will be paid back in folds, but in cases like these there is nothing to pay back, since as I said – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs." ("Rabbi Eliyahu: Life of one yeshiva boy worth more than 1,000 Arabs," Kobi Nahshoni, Ynet, April 3, 2008):

Because Gentiles are not human, Gentiles are owed no debt of morality or decency - not honesty [Baba Kamma 113a], not property [Baba Mezia 24a], not even life! — “The best of the Gentiles should all be killed” Soferim 15, 10

"Some of the Turks and the nomads in the North, and the Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does." Maimonides explaining who is not fit “to participate in the world to come,” Guide for the Perplexed, Book III, chapter 51 cited in Israel Shahak, Hebrew University Professor, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three
Thousand Years. London: Pluto Press, 1997. p. 25.


“The prohibition ‘Thou Shalt Not Murder’” applies only “to a Jew who kills a Jew,” write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur of the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar. Non-Jews are “uncompassionate by nature” and attacks on them “curb their evil inclination,” while babies and children of Israel’s enemies may be killed since “it is clear that they will grow to harm us.”

Here is a full translation of an article in an Israeli newspaper.Ma’ariv 09.11.09 (p. 2) by Roi Sharon :

Rabbi Eliyahu exhorts the killing of women and children:

Rabbis Yitzhak Ginzburg and Yaakov Yosef endorse Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro’s 2009 book endorsing the killing of babies and children, adding “It is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for [threatening Israel]. If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments - because we care about the commandments - there is nothing wrong with the murder.": 

“Who is funding the rabbis who endorse killing Gentile babies?” By Akiva Eldar, Ha’aretz, 11/17/09

“…For example, [Israel’s] government ministries regularly transfer support and funding to a yeshiva whose rabbi determined that it is permissible to kill gentile babies "because their presence assists murder, and there is reason to harm children if it is clear that they will grow up to harm us ... it is permissible to harm the children of a leader in order to stop him from acting evilly ... we have seen in the Halakha that even babies of gentiles who do not violate the seven Noahide laws, there is cause to kill them because of the future threat that will be caused if they are raised to be wicked people like their parents….”: 

The rabbis' calls to murder are still in the news:

Rabbinic Text or Call to Terror? By Daniel Estrin Published January 20, 2010, issue of January 29, 2010.

JERUSALEM — The marble-patterned, hardcover book embossed with gold Hebrew letters looks like any other religious commentary you’d find in an Orthodox Judaica bookstore — but reads like a rabbinic instruction manual outlining acceptable scenarios for killing non-Jewish babies, children and adults:

"One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1] at the eulogy for Dr. Baruch Goldstein, Kach Party terrorist who used a machine gun to murder at least 39 Palestinians worshipping at Cave of the Patriarchs mosque in Hebron. Rabbis praised his mass murder and then Prime Minister Yitshak Rabin gave permission for a memorial to honor Goldstein. Here's a picture of the shrine to the mass murderer:

Chabad leader Rebbe Schneerson taught that Christianity is a form of mental

See his video here:

More on Chabad:

"And for Christians let there be no hope..." Birkat HaMinim, "Benediction" #12 of the Shmone Esreh

"It is our duty to praise the Master of All, to ascribe greatness to the molder of primeval creation, for He has not made us like the nations of the lands, for He has not assigned our portion like theirs nor our lot like theirs, for they bow to vanity and emptiness and pray to a god who cannot save--man, ash, blood, bile, stinking flesh, maggot, defiled men and women, adulterers and adulteresses, dying in their iniquity and rotting in their wickedness, worn out dust, rot of maggot [and worm]--and pray to a god who cannot save." Aleinu from Judaic prayer book, Two Nations in Your Womb, Israel Jacob Yuval, University of California Press, 2006, p.119

“I want to attack their (non-Jew) souls.” Rabbi Abraham Heschel, interviewed by Geula Cohen for Ma'ariv, January 4, 1965 as translated by AJC/Paris: http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/12/vatican-ii-kabbalist-sage-rabbi-abraham.html

"Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate - healthy, virile hate - for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German." Elie Wiesel: Legends of Our Time, "Appointment with Hate, NY, Avon, 1968, pp. 177-178.

"I too, like Hitler, believe in the power of the blood idea" -Chaim Nachman Bailik, Israel’s national poet, in “The Present Hour” (1934).


Judaism excuses abortion through the rodef pilpul, that the baby is a rodef, a pursuer, an aggressor, whose life the mother may take. (among many, see "Jewish Law Favors Stem Cell Research," Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, July 30, 2004) Judaism teaches that the baby is not "nefesh," a person, until it is born. "Rashi, the venerated twelfth century Judaic interpreter of the Bible and Talmud, says of the fetus" 'lav nefesh hu - it is not a person." Rabbi Meir Abulafia decreed, 'So long as the fetus is inside the womb, it is not a nefesh and the Torah has no pity on it." The noted Judaic legal scholar Rabbi Isaac Schorr stated: 'The sense of the Talmud is that a fetus is not a person' (Responsa Koah Schorr, no. 20 ["responsa" are authoritative in Judaism and supersede the plain text of the "Hebrew Bible."]). The Talmud contains the expression 'ubar yerech imo' -the fetus is the thigh of its mother, i.e., the fetus is deemed to be part of the pregnant woman's body. The Greek philosopher Aristotle regarded the unborn child in its first seven days as 'secretion' (*ekrysis*). In rabbinic law the status of 'secretion' lasts for the first forty days of gestation. In Judaism the woman is not regarded as pregnant until the baby in her womb is more than forty days old.

"Contrary to these traditions of Judaism, God did not say in the Bible that He recognized the unborn baby only after forty days. He said He recognized it as a being before the child had even formed in the womb (Jeremiah 1:5) As usual, the rabbis go God one better and establish a term of forty days before recognition can be conferred, and that rabbinic recognition is only of the pregnancy itself, not of the humanity of the child.

"The matter does not rest at the forty day limit, however. In the familiar pattern of rabbinic modification, supplementation, and emendation, enough of these are generated to allow abortion at any time during the pregnancy for almost any reason, however fanciful or arbitrary. For example, if it is decided that an aborted baby does not look like a baby after it has been aborted, then it is not considered to have been an aborted child. [Tosefta Niddah 4:5-6]

"Since the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, the standard American abortion procedure is considerably Talmudic in nature, since the Talmud specifically states that if the unborn baby is adduced to be a rodef the rabbis authorize that it can be *chopped up* at any time: 'They chop up the child in her womb.' [Mishnah Ohalot 7:6]" - Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, ISBN 9780970378453, pp. 878-879.


Scholarship (including Torah scholarship), sexuality, and hospitality

The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition, Vol II, p.49

Lying to gentiles (Baba Kamma 113a)

For "peace" (meaning, "it's OK to lie to keep out of trouble") (Yebamoth

When everyone should know you are lying, "guzmah" (Hullin 90b)

"It is strictly forbidden to moser [inform the non-Judaic authorities on] either a Jewish person or his property. One who mosers a Jewish person or his property has no share in the world to come." (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat, 388)

The Culture of Deceit, Parts 1 & 2:

Swindlers’s List:


As to the hexagram, there is NO biblical reference to a “Star of David,” but there are references to the Star of Rempham (Acts 7:43) and Amos 5:26 notes:

“But you carried a tabernacle for your Moloch, and the image of your idols, the star of your god, which you made to yourselves.”

“And you took unto you the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Rempham, figures which you made to adore them. And I will carry you away beyond Babylon.” Acts 7:43


Lawrence of Cyberia: Tell Me Again, Who Made The Desert Bloom?: http://lawrenceofcyberia.blogs.com/news/2010/03/palestinians-made-the-desert-bloom.html

“In order to create an alleged justification for the crime of genocide they have committed against the Palestinian Arabs, the Zionists have tried to convince the world that Palestine was practically uninhabited, ‘A Land Without People For a People Without a Land.’ They created and propagated the myths that the Palestinian Arabs were nomads or semi-nomads without a culture and a civilization, that the Palestinians had neither a national identity nor existence, that the Palestinians lacked an economic structure and roots in the land.” *The Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem*, edited
by Dr. Issa Nakhleh, Continental Books, P.O. Box 756, Grand Central Station,
New York, NY 10163-0756, p. 33. available at :

“…In 1882, the Jewish population of Palestine was about 24,000. In 1914, the entire population of Palestine was estimated at 634,133 Muslim and Christian Arabs and 55,413 Jews. In 1920, after the British mandate, the official census showed the Arab population, both Muslim and Christian, at nearly 600,000, still greatly exceeding the Jews, who numbered 66,574. Until 1948
the Arab population continued to exceed the Jewish by roughly 2:1. Ibid.,

“… the last official British census in 1931 found Arabs in Jerusalem outnumbered Jews 2:1 with surrounding areas averaging 98% Arab! The Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian Question in the United Nations found in 1948 that, except for Haifa, ‘the Arabs have a clear majority over the Jews.’
Ibid., p. 26.

“So much for the Israeli… claim that for centuries Jews in Jerusalem and surrounding areas have outnumbered a tiny Arab population!
“During World War I, Arabs fought with the Allies against the Turks in hope of acquiring national independence. After the Balfour Declaration in 1917, the people of Palestine were considered by the League of Nations a ‘provisionally independent nation” very close to sovereignty. By 1947
Palestinian Arabs played a predominant role in government under the British. “The total number of government officials was 44,688 persons, of whom 4,314 were British, 30,178 Arabs, 9,276 Jews, and 920 others.’ Ibid., p. 28. Arabs also vastly outnumbered Jews in municipal councils and leadership in hundreds of primarily Arab towns and cities throughout Palestine.

“The land of Palestine had been a breadbasket of agricultural plenty going back to the original inhabitants, the Canaanites and later Philistines (for whom Palestine is named). Enjoying a climate similar to California’s, the Old Testament description was a “land that flows with milk and honey.”
Certainly, much of Palestine in recent centuries had been over-grazed, particularly the mountainous hill country of Judea surrounding Jerusalem. Such barrenness caused visitor Mark Twain to describe it as barren, with hardly an Arab to be seen. Yet, at nearly the same time, “Lawrence Oliphant, who visited Palestine in 1887, wrote that Palestine’s Valley of Esdraelon was ‘a huge green lake of waving wheat, with its village-crowned mounds rising from it like islands; and it presents one of the most striking pictures of luxurious fertility which it is possible to conceive.’” Ibid., p. 33. Numerous pre-20th century accounts, recounted in the *Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem,* describe it as a veritable cornucopia of every kind of agricultural produce, with excess exported by the Palestinians even to the nations of Europe. The Encyclopedia confirms that before 1948: “these Arab towns and villages were not merely place names on a map. They were developed communities containing farms, factories, stores and schools, with an infrastructure of doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers, merchants, mechanics, industrialists, workers, and farmers which would be the envy of any developing country today…Before 1948 they resided in 12 cities, 8 major towns, and 830 small towns and villages. Arab homes in the cities were either luxurious stone villas with beautiful gardens, or apartments with 2-5 bedrooms. These residences were well-furnished with modern furniture and household goods. No Arab home of the middle and upper classes contained less than eight valuable Persian carpets. All these homes and their furnishings were usurped by Israel.” Ibid. p. 34.
General Moshe Dayan tells the truth:

“We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is, a Jewish state here. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal arose in the place of Mahalul; Gevat in the place of Jibta; Sarid in the place of Haneifa and Kefar Yehoshua in the place of Tellshaman. There is not one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.” Ibid., p. 34.

“After 1948, Israel took over 12 cities and large towns and 526 small towns and villages. They bulldozed the towns and villages, building new towns with Jewish names. Ibid., “INDEX OF CITIES, TOWNS AND VILLAGES IN PALESTINE,” p. 347.

“The Encyclopedia extensively documents from British records that, far from Palestinians depending on Jewish prosperity, the Zionists were permeated with Marxist/collectivist values, resulting in eventual failure of the "kibbutz" experiment. Fairly new to Mideast agriculture, they were largely
inefficient, dependent upon regular massive infusion of Western Jewish capital. Despite a general Israeli policy of boycott of Palestinian goods and services, the Palestinians, with a rapidly growing population in 1948 of 1,444,274, were both politically, socially, and economically racing toward UN-sponsored nationhood in 1948. “Such prosperity came to an abrupt, horrific end after the Deir Yassin massacre by Zionist Irgun terrorists on April 9-10, 1948 and many subsequent Jewish outrages and atrocities, panicking 800,000 Palestinians into flight. “In 1948 the Zionists seized 90% of Arab-owned citrus groves, packaging and storage facilities, as well as that year’s crops, looting the prosperous Arab citrus growers, making them destitute refugees.” The same was true of all aspects of Palestinian industry, including olive oil, weaving, textile, tobacco, leather, dairy, wheat, fishing, and construction. In reality, confiscation of Palestinian resources largely constituted the “miracle” of Israel’s sudden abundant agriculture, of which the new state began boasting soon after expulsion of the Palestinians. This delighted evangelicals worldwide who saw it as stunning fulfillment of Biblical prophecy, making the "desert blossom as the rose." In reality, Israel now possessed thousands of acres of citrus, olives, wheat, etc. seized from the foremost agriculturists of the Middle East, Palestinian orchardists and farmers. The Encyclopedia: “The economic achievements of Israel today are built totally on the capital base of lands, property, and possessions usurped from the Palestinian Arabs.” Ibid., p. 34.: http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/debunkingfarahsfables.htm


"'Context' is everything for the defenders of the Talmud. Fair enough. But by 'context' they do not mean taking into account the surrounding text, but rather submitting to Judaism's own narrative about itself, which includes how it presents problem texts to non-Judaic audiences.... The rabbis even deny in many cases that there is a plain meaning.... It is enough that [the rabbi] states it and gentiles believe it; anything else is 'antisemitic.' This pattern of intimidation and thought control is repeated with monotonous effect, by thought cops and apologists for Judaism. It is a stock response intended to frighten off the opposition, premised mainly on the moral authority of the declarative sentences used by the 'expert' on Judaism. Debate ('polemic') on the part of informed skeptics is not permitted, since it constitutes the 'misuse' of a scholar's knowledge of rabbinic texts. Debating tactics and polemical tools are reserved solely for rabbis and their allies, along with just a dash of permissible dissimulation to leaven the burden of swallowing the pottage. And when deception and 'out of context' statements serve to advance Judaism, they are all well and good...." Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit. ISBN 13: 9780970378453 pages 137-138


“Politically, the position of Jews in the Christian Spanish kingdoms was the highest ever attained by Jews in any country (except some of the ta'ifas and under the Fatimids) before the 19th century. Many Jews served officially as Treasurers General to the kings of Castile, regional and general tax collectors, diplomats (representing their king in foreign courts, both Muslim and Christian, even outside Spain), courtiers and advisers to rulers and great noblemen. And in no other country except Poland did the Jewish community wield such great legal powers over the Jews or used them so widely and publicly, including the power to inflict capital punishment.

“From the 11th century the persecution of Karaites (a heretical Jewish sect) [“heretical” because Karaites follow Mosaic Law, not Talmudic Law, “*halacha *”] by flogging them to death if unrepentant was common in Castile. Jewish women who cohabited with Gentiles had their noses cut off by rabbis who explained that 'in this way she will lose her beauty and her non-Jewish lover will come to hate her'. Jews who had the effrontery to attack a rabbinical judge had their hands cut off. Adulterers were imprisoned, after being made to run the gauntlet through the Jewish quarter. In religious disputes, those thought to be heretics had their tongues cut out ...” Prof. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion–the Weight of Three Thousand Years


"If a Noahite is striving in the learning of Torah... reveals new aspects of Torah, he may be PHYSICALLY RESTRAINED and informed that he is liable for CAPITAL PUNISHMENT... If the court that is established in consonance with the Seven Universal Laws gives the DEATH PENALTY to a Noahite, the EXECUTION is an atonement for the person's past transgression... Furthermore, the Noahite must experience REINCARNATION to be able to atone for transgressions he has done." Chaim Clorfene & Yakov Rogalsky, "The Path of the Righteous Gentile: An Introduction to the Seven Laws of the children of Noah," (Feldheim Publishers, 1987) p. 42 (The book bears an official letter of approval of its contents by Rabbi Mendel Feldman, Shearith Israel
"The Christians are idolaters, and Sunday is their holiday..." [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Avodah Zorah, 9;4]

"The Christians are worshipers of Avodah Zorah ["idolatry"]" [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Ma'akhalot Assurot, 11:7]

"It is a *mitzvah* [religious duty], however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, *minim* [Christians], and *apikorsim*, ["heretics," i.e., sincere Judaic converts to Christianity] and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot." [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Chapter 10]

"... a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner [in other words, insincere worship such as (1) faking worship to obtain business or social advantage, as the Marranos, or (2) denying Jesus' divinity, does not earn the death
penalty]. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment." [Maimonides, Hilchot Melachim XI, Mishneh Torah]

The Jewish Encyclopedia affirms that the punishment for Christian "idolatry" is beheading. See: "Laws, Noachian," Jewish Encyclopedia entry:

Maimonides legislates that it is incumbent upon the Jewish people even to coerce the rest of the world if necessary to accept the Noahide laws [Mishneh Torah , Laws of Kings 8,10] ... we certainly must proselytize every human being to keep those seven laws." (Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, Center for
Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation:

A Grave Mistake in Need of Correction: A Response to the Meeting Between Rabbi Shlomo Riskin and Pope Benedict XVI – The only thing worse than injustice is an attempt to disguise it: http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/topics/news/3203-a-grave-mistake-in-need-ofcorrection-a-response-to-the-meeting-between-rabbi-shlomo-riskin-and-pope-benedict-xvi

One of many possible examples of how the “Noachide Law” system of double-standards is absurdly preferential to “Jews” and tyrannical towards everyone else from the Babylonian Talmud:

"A non-Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

"A Jew can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jew."[Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110]
Rabbis Yitzhak Ginzburg and Yaakov Yosef endorse Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro’s 2009 book endorsing the killing of Gentile babies and children, adding “It is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for [threatening Israel]. If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments - because we care about the commandments - there is nothing wrong with the murder.":

Much like the word "Torah" makes a Christian wrongly think that the rabbis are referring to the Pentateuch, but actually refer to "Torah SheBeal Peh" (the Oral "Torah" that was later compiled into the Talmud and Kabbalistic books), Christians think that the "Noah" of "Noachide Law" is the biblical Noah, but wrong again. No, the Noah of the Noachide Law is most unbiblical, mocked in the rabbinical literature as an incompetent drunk incapable of fulfilling God's commission, and who compounded the sin of Adam.

"Three had a passion of agriculture [N.B. farming is an occupation of disrepute in Judaism] and no good was found in them: Cain, Noah, and Uzziah." Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I, translated by Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman (Soncino, 1983) vol. 1, p. 289.

"The rabbis teach that Noah ended as a castrate. One story has it that he was castrated by a lion while he was drunk and on his way to have intercourse and this `scattered his semen.' Alternatively the Midrash says that it was actually Ham who castrated Noah, and that Noah told Ham, `You have prevented me from doing something in the dark [having sex], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned.'" [more on Maimonides' racism later] Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I, translated by Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman (Soncino, 1983) vol. 1, p. 283.

"It is claimed that as `Noachides,' these `good' gentiles will not have to follow all the rules of the Talmud of Judaism, only the `Seven Laws of Noah.' What they are not told is that in order to faithfully adhere to the so-called Seven Laws of Noah, the `righteous gentiles' are obligated to
suffer the prize indignity of submitting to rabbinic interpretations of those laws, which amount to an infinite number of glosses and explications running from here to eternity. A more accurate name for the heavy burdens with which these gullible gentiles are going to bind themselves would be the Seven Billion Noachide Laws.... Maimonides ruled that when a Judaic murders even a righteous gentile (a gentile who is a friend and ally of Judaism) the Judaic is not to be harmed: `A Jew who killed a righteous gentile is not executed in a court of law as it says (Exodus 21:14 `If a man shall act intentional against his fellow...' (and a gentile is not considered a fellow) and even more so that he is not executed for killing an unrighteous gentile.' (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Rotze'ach 2:11. The Judaic publishing company's commentary accompanying the preceding teaching of Maimonides states that Jesus was an example of a min (plural: minim)." Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN 13: 9780970378453, pp. 496-499 The rabbis teach that Jesus Himself was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a, 107b], even teaching such insanities as claiming that Jesus worshipped a brick. [Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 67a, 107b] There are, of course, other numerous scurrilous accusations against Jesus in the Talmud and rabbinical literature. Though the passages have been denied and expurgated Talmud editions have been published, often using code words for Jesus, Princeton Professor and Director of JUDAIC Studies Peter Schafer has examined dozens of Talmud editions in the original and vernacular languages. Schafer not only adduces the explicit references to Jesus of Nazareth, but he also traces the code words used in the Talmud editions expurgated and sanitized for Gentile consumption. Schafer traces from edition to tractate to folio how "Balaam," "that man," "the carpenter," "ben Pandera" (son of Pandera), the blank spaces, and the rest of the code words refer to Jesus of Nazareth. In his book "Jesus in the Talmud" (ISBN 13: 978-0691129266) Schafer has affirmed that the Talmud teaches that that Jesus was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a, 107b], was a "mamzer" [bastard] conceived adulterously in "niddah" [menstrual filth] by a Roman soldier named Pandera [Kallah 51a] of a whore [Sanhedrin 106a] and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces and, in some editions because Jesus is accused of sexual perversion, semen [Gittin 57a]. Schafer documents much more, including the Talmud claim that the Sanhedrin justly executed Jesus because he was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a, 107b] who worshipped a brick [Sanhedrin 67a], even boasting that the Sanhedrin overcame Roman opposition to the execution of Jesus [Sanhedrin 43a]."

In the context of Noachide Laws, why is this important? Because idoloaters are liable for execution under halacha, Torah Law.

Practicing Christians worship Jesus as True God and True man, hence, under Torah law, are idolaters liable for execution.


"The sages of the true wisdom teach that every Jewish soul must REINCARNATE many times until it has fulfilled all the 613 mitzvos in action, speech, and thought." Shulchan Aruch HaRav: Hilchos Talmud Torah 1:4 Rabbi Ovadia Yosef on the REINCARNATION of Judaic souls: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/rabbi-says-holocaust-victims-were-reincarnations-of-sinners-711547.html

"If a Noahite is striving in the learning of Torah... reveals new aspects of Torah, he may be physically restrained and informed that he is liable for capital punishment... If the court that is established in consonance with the Seven Universal Laws gives the death penalty to a Noahite, the execution is an atonement for the person's past transgression... Furthermore, the Noahite must experience REINCARNATION to be able to atone for transgressions he has done." Chaim Clorfene & Yakov Rogalsky, "The Path of the Righteous Gentile: An Introduction to the Seven Laws of the children of Noah," (Feldheim Publishers, 1987) p. 42 (The book bears an official letter of approval of its contents by Rabbi Mendel Feldman, Shearith Israel Congregation.)


Jews are not “orthodox” for following Mosaic Law, but orthodox for following the perversion and Master Race and pagan precepts of the Oral Torah (see below) for which Jesus unmistakably damned the Pharisees and their followers as “children of Hell” Matthew 23:15.

The Kabbalistic books of the Oral Torah, including the Zohar and Sefer Yetzirah, are in the lineage of Egyptian and Babylonian black magic that spawned idolatry of the Golden Calf, even to the Israelites worshipping, fornicating with, and sacrificing their children to the demon Moloch (Leviticus 20:3-5, 3 Kings 11:5-33, et al.). No less than in the days of the Israelites (1 Kings 8:8; Malachias 2:8-12), contemporary Judaism retains worship of pagan “strange gods”: Birkat ha-Hammah sun worship
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2009/02/more-pagan-judaism-birkat-ha-hammah.html(persists even though Ezechiel 8:16-17 specifically damns it as an abomination in the eyes of God), moon worship (kiddush levanah:
polytheism (the worship of the goddess Shekinah):
See especially Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit: http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com/2010/03/michael-hoffmans-online-revisionist.html
 http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:O1HaB8VL6lAJ:kabbalah-beliefs.suite101.com/article.cfm/gilgul-neshamah-soul-reincarnationortransmigrationofsouls+gilgul&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari),  :

See also: The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic and Mysticism by Rabbi Geoffrey W. Dennis, ISBN-13: 978-0738709055:

A bit more on pagan polytheistic Judaism — the rabbis' magic skulls: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/181975-Rare-Magic-Inscription-on-Human-Skull

"There are two kinds of necromancy: the one where the dead is raised by naming him, the other where he is invoked by means of a skull." —The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 65b


"Jews don't read the Bible literally. We read it through the lens of generations of interpretations and acknowledge the evolution of human understanding of God. The Talmudic image of God is vastly different from the image of God presented in the Bible." [Rabbi Laura Geller, Senior Rabbi, Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills, California
"This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible." [Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159]

"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism." [Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474]

“Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” [Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, The Jewish Publication Society of America (1946) p. xxi]

"The Talmud is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the 'Tradition of the Elders,' and to which He makes frequent allusions." [Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the Talmud: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger
Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70]

“The complex of rabbinically ordained practices ... including most of the rules for the treatment of Scripture itself--do not derive from Scripture at all. Rabbinic Judaism's initial concern was with the elaboration and refinement of it's own system. Attaching the system to scripture was secondary. It therefore is misleading to depict rabbinic Judaism primarily as a consequence of an exegetical process or the organic unfolding of Scripture. Rather, rabbinic Judaism began as the work of a small, ambitious, and homogeneous group of pseudo-priests ...By the third century (A.D.) the rabbis expressed their self-conception in the ideology of "oral Torah" which held that a comprehensive body of teachings and practices (*halachot*) not included in Scripture had been given by God and through Moses only to the rabbinic establishment.” (Rabbi Jacob Nuesner, *Rabbinic Judaism: Structure and System*, pp. 31-34)

Don’t get suckered into one of the oldest rabbinical tricks, the claim that the Talmud is based on "Torah." A Christian assumes that "Torah" = Pentateuch, but there's the trick. In Judaism there are at least FIVE definitions of Torah. Here's the proof:

Please note FOUR definitions of Torah in the Jewish Encyclopedia's entry on Torah:

“Originally, in order to maintain the distinction between the written Torah (see written law) and various traditional interpretations, customs and practices, the rabbis forbade the commitment to writing of the additional material. However, when it became too voluminous and chaotic conditions made oral transmission too uncertain, the ban was lifted and the material organized and transcribed in the form of the Mishnah, the Talmud, and other rabbinic works. The rabbis expressed their view that 'two Torahs' were given at Sinai, a Written Torah [Torah She Bich Tav, DEFINITION #1] and an Oral Torah [Torah SheBeal Peh, DEFINITION #2] (see oral law) and that at least some of the oral traditions relating to the meaning of basic biblical concepts were as authoritative as the written text (see halakah le-mosheh mi-sinai) In a sense the Oral Torah came to be regarded as more important
than the Written Torah inasmuch as the explanations and understanding of the latter depended upon the former. A third meaning of the word ‘Torah’ therefore includes elements of the Oral Torah, which are considered authoritative or deoraita ---'from the Torah.' Finally in its broadest sense, the word 'Torah' is sometimes used to refer to the entire corpus of Halacha and Aggadah, [DEFINITION #3] Written and Oral, from the Bible up to and including the latest Responsa and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis [DEFINITION #4]....” [The New Encyclopedia of Judaism, Geoffrey
Wigoder editor in Chief, New York: New York University Press, 2002, ISBN
0814793996, page 778]

Please note a FIFTH definition of Torah according to the Holy Father's favorite rabbi, “a great scholar” [Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth, p.71]:

“... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was Torah [DEFINITION #5], not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself.” [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of 'Being a Rabbi' in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]

It gets worse because these “Torah” are on an ever-widening trajectory from God. Consider explicit corollaries of the great scholar's presumption that, because the rabbis are divine, they can “alter the very content of Mosaic revelation.”

“...the Babylonian Talmud represents God in the flesh...” Rabbi Jacob Neusner, Rabbinic Judaism, Minneapolis MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1995. p. 62

"The Holy One, Blessed be He, speaks Torah out of the mouths of all rabbis.” Haggadah 15b

"The Bavli [Babylonian Talmud] has formed the definitive statement of Judaism from the time of its closure to the present day." Rabbi Jacob Neusner, quoted by Norman F. Cantor, The Sacred Chain: A History of the Jews, page 112)

The occultic portion of the Talmud, the Kabala, at Tikkunei Zohar 1:27b refers to the Mishnah of the Talmud as “the burial place of Moses.” The reference is an apt double entendre because the Talmud at Shabbat 15 teaches that it supersedes and nullifies the Old Testament, so “buries” the Pentateuch of Moses.
“Think not that I will accuse you to the Father: There is one that accuseth you, Moses, in whom you trust. For if you did believe in Moses, you would perhaps believe me also; for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?” John 5:43-47

The "tradition of the Elders" actually "buries Moses" (Tikkunei Zohar 1:27b), disparages Moses (and Isaias), places Moses in the 18th row of Talmud "sage" Rabbi Akiva like a dunce in the back of the class (Menachot 22b).

Since converts from Judaism revealed the foundational teachings of Judaism, much effort has been invested in sanitizing vernacular translations of the Talmud. These sanitized editions are useful to the rabbis: "See it's not there." Or "The tractate is about 'Balaam'"
In the sanitized Talmud editions numerous code word substitutions are used for Christians (min, Cuthean, Egyptian, Epicurean, etc.) and Jesus of Nazareth ("that man," "the carpenter," "Balaam," "ben Pantera, a reference to the Talmud's teaching that Jesus was the bastard of a whore who committed adultery with a Roman soldier named Pantera).

The Talmud (Torah SheBeal Peh) teaches that Jesus was a b-stard born of an adulterous relationship (Kallah 51a) of a wh-re (Sanhedrin 106a) and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces because he "worshipped a brick" and, because he is accused of sexual perversion. (Gittin 57a).

The Talmud Sanhedrin 43a boasts that the Sanhedrin convicted Jesus and, at the Jewish court's instigation, He was crucified, “hanged,” even though the Romans were “inclined toward acquittal” of Jesus; therefore Jewish denial and blame-shifting to the Romans is a lie. The infamous Toldoth Jeschu, Maimonides' Hilkoth Akun V, 3 and Letter to Yemen), and the 1905 Jewish
Encyclopedia (page 170), all boast of Jewish responsibility for Christ's death. The Talmud notes that Jesus deserved four more deaths. Sanhedrin 52a suggests Jesus should have been strangled while immersed in dung. There are other Talmudic passages that describe Jesus as an idolatrous sex freak,
practicing black magic —and more

Pursuing the anti-Biblical nature of Judaism and its Talmud:

“On the surface, Scripture plays little role in the Mishanaic system, The Mishnah [of the Talmud] rarely cites a verse of Scripture, refers to Scripture as an entity, links its own ideas to those of Scripture, or lays claim to originate in what Scripture has said, even by indirect or remote
allusion to a Scriptural verse of teaching... Formally, redactionally, and linguistically the Mishnah stands in splendid isolation from Scripture....the Mishnah constitutes Torah. [definition #2 ‘Written Torah’] It too is a statement of revelation, 'Torah revealed to Moses at Sinai.' But this part of revelation has come down in a form different from the well-known, written part, the Scripture. This tradition truly deserves the name 'tradition,' because for a long time it was handed down orally, not in
writing, until given the written formulation now before us in the Mishnah.... Since some of the named authorities in the chain of tradition appear throughout the materials of the Mishnah, the claim is that what these people say comes to them from Sinai through the processes of qabbalah and massoret --handing down 'traditioning.' So the reason... that the Mishnah does not cite Scripture is that it does not have to.” [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, The Mishnah: A New Translation. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1988. pp. xxxv-xxxvi].
Note the casual admission that both “qabbalah and massoret [the vaunted, but bowdlerized, ‘Hebrew Bible’]” change Scripture through “process,” “traditioning.” In Judaism tradition is not fixed or faithful, but is an ever-changing “process” that is described as “traditioning.” This is why
“the latest response and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis” are Torah, [definition #4] hence authoritative in Judaism.

Indeed all this oral “traditioning” is precisely what Jesus fingered as “make void the commandments of God for the traditions of men.” [Mark 7:9]. Since the rabbis are free to “alter even the very content of Mosaic revelation” with impunity, we begin to understand why Jesus said, “there is one that accuseth you, Moses” [John 5:45-47].

Do not be misled by a rabbi's mere mention of the word Torah. You must pin him down: "Which 'Torah'?" Then watch out for the pilpul, mental reservations, and Kol Nidre deceit that will inevitably follow.

“Jewish Mysticism- According to Rabbi Steinsaltz, Jewish mysticism – or Kabbalah – is the official theology of the Jewish people. Although the world of Kabbalah is profoundly symbolic and abstract, its teachings are of tremendous significance to the individual and to society alike. Its influences are evident in all Jewish spheres – the prayer book, the Talmud, and Jewish philosophy. Kabbalah is not a separate area of Torah knowledge, but rather the hidden, spiritual dimension of the revealed aspects of the Torah. These revealed facets of Torah – such as halakha (Jewish law) – speak primarily about visible, physical things; Kabbalah, on the other hand, speaks directly about spiritual entities, like the system of olamot (spiritual “worlds,” or graduated levels of reality) and sefirot (divine “attributes,” or channels of divine energy) through which God creates, sustains and directs the universe. It also discusses the interaction between those entities and the performance of mitzvot in the physical world. It is for this reason that Kabbalah has been called the soul of the Torah.

The character of Kabbalah is perhaps manifested most clearly in Hasidut. By changing the terminology of Kabbalah yet maintaining its messages, Hasidut offers a simpler, more accessible way of unlocking its secrets. The Hasidic movement, which has prompted dramatic changes in the outlook of the Jewish people, began in the late 18th century with the teachings of Rabbi Yisrael Ba’al Shem Tov. By re-emphasizing the value of every Jew, the Ba’al Shem Tov provided his disciples with the opportunity to link the individual closer to the Almighty. Hasidism has breathed new vitality into Jewish life, offering an alternate route to the arduous and, for some, unattainable path of study.”: http://www.steinsaltz.org/content.php?pg=Introduction&ID=65

"Talmud - The authoritative body of Jewish law and lore accumulated over a period of seven centuries (c. 200 BCE - c. 500 CE) in Erets Israel and Babylonia." —The New Encyclopedia of Judaism, Geoffrey Wigoder, editor in Chief, New York: New York University Press, 2002, ISBN 0814793996, page 747
There are verses in the Torah that were explained away by the rabbis of the Talmud as either not applying any longer, never applying or they get made so complex to enact that they eventually fall away.

The Torah condones the death penalty while the Talmud pretty much outlaws it. [see Hoffman’s analysis] The Torah tells us to take our malcontent children to the gates of the city and if they can't be reformed by the elders, to stone them to death. The Talmud tells us that never happened and never should happen.... Sorry!

And, in the reverse, the Torah is pretty clear about what keeping kosher should look like, and it is pretty simple, while the rabbis of the Talmud and later codes expanded the laws and made them quite complex. We have a long history of interpreting our Torah, redefining its meaning, and using
very advanced and creative hermeneutical tools to either alter, or in some cases, downright change, what the original meaning seems to have been. We have the principle of PARDES, which is a rabbinic literary invention, whereby each word of the Torah has four levels of interpretation: the
literal meaning, peshat, a more subtle or hinting reading, remez, a creative commentary, drash, and a totally hidden or mysterious meaning, sod. Through this technique, and many others, commentators, most famously Rashi, 11th century in France, have sometimes completely changed the text from what it literally says. “The Torah, The Constitution, and the 4th of July” Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater, Spiritual leader, Pasadena Jewish Temple and Center


“Israel is not to be accused of pederasty.” Kiddushin 82a


Leviticus 18:22 "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination...."

Sanhedrin 54b "If a boy under the age of nine perpetrated sodomy upon an adult, the adult is not liable for punishment, for the intercourse of a boy under nine years of age is not legally an act of intercourse. Since a child less than nine years old cannot commit sodomy, he can also not be the object of sodomy....This Baraita supports Rav, for it teaches that if a man engaged in homosexual intercourse with a child under the age of nine, he is exempt from liability."

"…intercourse with a boy under nine years old is not considered a significant sexual act..." Ketubot 11b

"If a girl is less than three years old, it is permitted to be secluded with her. Likewise, if a boy is less than nine years old a woman is permitted to be alone with him." Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: A Classic Guide to Jewish Law (Metsudah Publications, 1996) v. 2, p. 1023

"If a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for having intercourse with a girl less than three years old is like putting a finger in the eye." Ketubot 11b
There is also the Torah’s excuse for "unwitting" sodomy [Sanhedrin 54b] as if such an unnatural and intrinsically difficult act could be accidental. As Hoffman opines, such a loophole is "beneath contempt." Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit. ISBN 13: 9780970378453 pp. 676-705.
At tractate Yebamoth 63a the Torah teaches that "Adam had intercourse with all the beasts and animals" in the Garden of Eden. At tractate Gittin 69b the Torah teaches that the cure of a catarrh is to "take the excrement of a white dog kneaded with balsam." Then, of course, the rabbis still perform
their oral circumcision ritual Mezizah b'peh on little boys, sometimes causing the death of innocent babies:

The Mezizah b'peh:

By this is meant the sucking of the blood from the circumcision wound. The mohel takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle (see Fig. 4, below) provided for the purpose. This procedure [repeatedly sucking the boy’s privates] is repeated several times, and completes the operation, except as to the control of the bleeding and the dressing of the wound.

See proof of the vile act:

Rabbi: "Kill those who report Judaic rape of children!":

An 8-year-old girl who has been raped and who identified her father as her rapist to a trained medical professional is not to be believed. The medical professional is forbidden to contact law enforcement, social workers or child protection or do anything that could get the father arrested. If the medical professional is about to call police and cannot be stopped by any other means, he can and should be killed. And the father who raped the little girl? The father remains just as he was before, free.

The author of this depraved ruling is Rabbi Menashe Klein, a contemporary Hasidic "Gadol" (great rabbi of his generation), who heads the Ungar kehillah Yeshiva Bais Shearim, in Boro Park, Brooklyn, New York:

October 8, 2010 World Jewish Congress oligarch chartered child-rape boat:
October 29, 2010

Former B’nai B’rith head admits downloading 9 hours of child pornography for “education”:


April 6, 2011 Top Pinto Aide Tied to Porn Sales and Legal Troubles:  By Josh Nathan-Kazis | Forward (Zionist newspaper)

June 14, 2011 Rep. Anthony Wiener’s Satanic Rebbe http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/06/anthony-weiners-satanic-rebbe.html


“On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for forty days: 'Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited [to idol worship] and led Israel astray. Whoever knows an argument in his favor should come and argue on his
behalf.' But they did not find an argument in his favor, and they hanged him on Passover Eve ... Jesus ... had close connections with the non-Jewish authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal. Thus it was necessary to give him all the opportunity to clear himself, so that the justice of his conviction not be challenged ... Was Jesus of Nazareth deserving of a search for an argument in his favor? He was an inciter, and the Torah (lit., "the Merciful") says: ‘You shall not spare, nor shall you conceal him!’” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 43a, Steinsaltz edition, Vol

"... some medieval apologists for Judaism, as Nachmanides and Salman Zebi, ... [asserted] that the 'Yeshu' mentioned in the Talmud was not identical with Jesus; this, however, is merely a subterfuge." Jewish Encyclopedia, "Jesus of Nazareth":

“... the Talmud [Torah SheBeal Peh] is here offering a subtle commentary upon Jesus' political connections. The Gospels portray the Roman governor Pontius Pilate as going to great lengths to spare Jesus (Mark 15: 6-15). Although this passage may well have been written to appease the Roman authorities and blame the Jews, the Talmudic passage points in the same direction ...
“... the passage suggests rabbinic willingness to take responsibility for the execution of Jesus. No effort is made to pin his death upon the Romans. In all likelihood, the passage in question emanates from fourth-century Babylon, then the center of Talmudic scholarship, and beyond the reach of
both Rome and Christianity. Although several hundred years had elapsed since the lifetime of Jesus, and therefore this is not at all a contemporary source, the Talmudic passage indicates rabbinic willingness to acknowledge, at least in principle, that in a Jewish court and in a Jewish land, a real-life Jesus would indeed have been executed ... ("Jesus in the Talmud," Steven Bayme, American Jewish Committee National Director, September 24, 2003):

“The very fact that the Talmud's claim of Jesus' closeness to the Roman government reflects some knowledge ... of the New Testament narrative, particularly of John's version of it ... this detail exonerates the Roman government from the blame of Jesus' condemnation and consequently, adopting the Gospels' message, puts the thrust of the accusation on the Jews ... What we then have here in the [Babylonian Talmud] is a powerful confirmation of the New Testament Passion narrative, a creative rereading, however, that not only knows some of its distinct details but proudly proclaims Jewish responsibility of Jesus' execution.” (Jesus in the Talmud, Peter Schafer, Princeton University Press, pp.73-74)

Peter Schafer's (Director of Judaic Studies at Princeton University) scholarship is impeccable and he has concluded that, *"Finally, as to the [Talmud] narratives about Jesus' execution, the fate of his disciples, and Jesus' punishment in hell, there can be no doubt that they are talking about Jesus/Jesus the Nazarene ... One major result of our survey of the talmudic manuscripts was the finding that the Jesus passages abound in the manuscripts not only before the implementation of Christian censorship but even thereafter. This evidence strongly suggests that indeed Jesus of Nazareth is the original [subject] of our Bavli [Babylonian Talmud] stories and that the available manuscripts do reflect the earliest possible form of our stories."* (*Jesus in the Talmud,* Peter Schafer, pp.142-143, Princeton
University Press)

Schafer not only adduces the explicit references to Jesus of Nazareth, but he also traces the code words used in the Talmud editions expurgated and sanitized for Gentile consumption. Schafer traces from edition to tractate to folio how "Balaam," "that man," "the carpenter," "ben Pandera" (son of
Pandera), the blank spaces, and the rest of the code words refer to Jesus of Nazareth. So, as has so many times been demonstrated, Schafer shows the Talmud teaches that Jesus was a "mamzer" [bastard] conceived adulterously in "niddah" [menstrual filth] by a Roman soldier named Pantera [Kallah 51a] of a whore [Sanhedrin 106a] and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces and, in some editions because Jesus is accused of sexual perversion, semen [Gittin 57a]. Schafer documents much more, including the Talmud claim that the Sanhedrin justly executed Jesus because he was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a] who worshipped a brick [Sanhedrin 67a], even boasting that the Sanhedrin overcame Roman opposition to the execution of Jesus [Sanhedrin 43a].

Censorship of rabbinic texts has historically presented rabbinic apologists with the opportunity to dissemble claiming that the "Talmud doesn't say anything bad about Jesus" by referring to censored Talmud texts. Meanwhile, the rabbis passed Chesronos HaShas among each other which contained the censored passages so they could continue teaching "Jews" the hateful anti-Christian teachings that the censors erased.

Matthew 21:38 But the husbandmen seeing the son, said among themselves: This is the heir: come, let us kill him, and we shall have his inheritance.

John 19:11 “…he that hath delivered me to thee, hath the greater sin.”
John 11:47-53 The chief priests therefore, and the Pharisees, gathered a council, and said: What do we, for this man doth many miracles? If we let him alone so, all will believe in him; and the Romans will come, and take away our place and nation. But one of them, named Caiphas, being the high
priest that year, said to them: You know nothing. Neither do you consider that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. And this he spoke not of himself: but being the high priest of that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for the nation. And not only for the nation, but to gather together in one the children of God, that were dispersed. From that day therefore they devised to put him to death.

Acts 3:12-15 But Peter seeing, made answer to the people: Ye men of Israel, why wonder you at this? or why look you upon us, as if by our strength or power we had made this man to walk? The God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son
Jesus, whom you indeed delivered up and denied before the face of Pilate, when he judged he should be released. But you denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you. But the author of life you killed, whom God hath raised from the dead, of which we are witnesses.
I Thessalonians 2:14-15 For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own coutrymen, even as they have from the Jews, Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men;


The Koliner rebbe [17th century rabbi of Prague] states: "Our Zaddikim's
(famous Orthodox rabbis) words are more important than the Torah of Moses As our Sages teach: A Zaddik decrees, and God obeys." Jeremy Dauber, *Antonio's Devils: Writers of the Jewish Enlightenment and the Birth of Modern Hebrew and Yiddish Literature, *Stanford University, 2004, ISBN-13: 978-0804749015, p. 276, also documented in Judaism Discovered, p. 298
"... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was Torah, not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself." [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, "The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of 'Being a Rabbi' in Later Sasanian Babylonia," Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]
"God smiled and said: 'My sons have defeated Me, My sons have defeated Me!' God's sons ‘defeated him' with their arguments. Rabbi Yehoshua was correct in his contention that a view confirmed by majority vote must be accepted, even where God Himself holds the opposite view." (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Bava Metzia 59b, Steinsaltz Edition [NY: Random House 1990], Vol. III p.237)
“The [Pharisaic-Rabbinic] schools believed that in heaven God and the angels studied Torah [i.e., Talmud/Kabbalah] just as the rabbis did on earth. God donned phylacteries like a rabbi. He prayed in rabbinic mode ... He guided the affairs of the world according to the rules of the Torah, like the rabbi in his court. One exegesis of the Creation-legend taught that God had looked into the Torah and therefrom had created the world. Moreover, heaven was aware above of what the rabbis in particular thought, said, and did below. The myth of the Torah was multi-dimensional. It included the striking detail that whenever the most recent rabbi was destined to discover through proper exegesis of the tradition was as much of a part of the way revealed to Moses as was a sentence of Scripture itself. It was therefore possible to participate in the giving of the law, as it were, by appropriate, logical inquiry into the law. God himself, studying and living by Torah, was believed to subject himself to these same rules of logical inquiry, so if an earthly court overruled the testimony, delivered through some natural miracles, of the heavenly one, God would rejoice, crying out, ‘My sons have conquered me! My sons have conquered me!’ [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, "The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of 'Being a Rabbi' in Later Sasanian Babylonia," Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]

We’re Right, the Whole World’s Wrong. By Dov Fischer:


“After each bowel movement or urination, even of one drop, you should wash your hands and recite the berachah, asher yatzar. If you urinated or moved your bowels and forgot to recite the berachah, asher yatzar, and after urinating or moving your bowels again, you remembered that you did not
recite the berachah, you need to recite the berachah only once. After partaking of a laxative that induces diarrhea, and you know that you will use the toilet numerous times, you should not recite the berachah until after all excrement has passed through you.” Berakoth 23a

“And our rabbis taught: One who goes to the bathroom in Judea should not do so east and west, but rather north and south. In Galilee he should do so only east and west…. It has been taught: Rabbi Akiva said: once I went in the bathroom and spied upon Rabbi Joshua while he was on the toilet, and I learned from him three things. I learned that one does not sit east and west, but north and south; I learned that one defecates not standing but sitting; and I learned that it is proper to wipe with the left hand and not with the right. R. Tanhum said: ‘Whoever behaves modestly in a bathroom is
delivered from three things: from snakes, from scorpions, and from evil spirits and disturbing dreams.” Berakoth 61b-62a

“… it is permitted to brush off drops of urine even with one’s right hand, and one may use that hand to kill a louse. When one urinates while standing, and many drops of urine will fall on his feet if he does not lift his penis, he is permitted to raise it by lifting his testicles. If the drops of urine fall on his feet, he should clean them off immediately with his hands and not walk among people in this manner (since drops of urine on a person’s feet may arouse the suspicion that his penis is mutilated and his children are illegitimate). Him not hold the penis itself to raise it, for ‘ he who holds his organ is considered as if he brought a flood upon the world,’ lest he become aroused and emit seed wastefully. [This stringency applies] unless he holds the penis from the corona downward, i.e., towards the ground, for this will not arouse him. Alternatively, he may hold [his organ] with a thick cloth, for this too will not arouse him. When a person is married, and his wife is in the same city as he is, and she is ritually pure, the letter of the law permits him to hold his penis even above the corona.” Niddah 13a -43a


"...a man may do whatever he pleases with his wife at intercourse: Meat which comes from the abattoir may be eaten salted, roasted, cooked or seethed; so with fish from the fishmonger.... A woman came before Rab and complained [of her husband's sodomy with her], "Rabbi replied: 'Wherein does it differ from fish?" Nedarim 20b, Soncino edition, p.58

The birth of a girl is a sad occurrence. Baba Bathra 16b

Women are a "Vain treasure" to their fathers. Sanhedrin 110b

"Thank you God for not making me a gentile, a woman, or a slave." Menahoth

"If two women sit at a crossroads, one on this side and the other on the other side, and they face one another, they are certainly witches." Pesahim 111a

A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest. Yebamoth 59b

It is not good to talk to women, not even your own wife. Aboth

Women are lightheaded. Kiddushin 29b

It is permissible to divorce your wife if she burns your dinner, or if you see a prettier girl. Gittin 91a

"... the best of women is filled with witchcraft." Kiddushin 66c

"...the more wives, the more witchcraft." Mishnah Abot 2:7

Gentile women are "Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah, and Zonah" (menstrual filth, slaves, heathens, and whores) Sanhedrin 81b-82a

“It has been clearly proven that the Jew Juce Franco did seduce some Christians [false converts from Judaism, “Marranos”] to the rites and ceremonies of the Law of Moses by teaching them Jewish prayers, praying in Hebrew to the Creator to whom he commended them, and telling them that the
Law of Moses was the true law, whereas the Law of Christ was false. He also taught them the times of the Jewish Passover and other Fasts, and explained to them why the Jews did not eat certain meats. He further did communicate to and participate with these same Christians [Marranos] in other mysteries of his Jewish law, serving them Jewish foods and wine, eating and drinking with them the better to confirm them in the Law of Moses. …This Juce Franco personally took part, together with other Jews and with Christians [Marranos], in the crucifixion –at night and in a secret cave– of an innocent Christian boy. They stretched out his arms and legs on two boards arranged in the form of a Cross. Then they flogged him, spat on him, beat him, tore out the pieces of his flesh, and put a crown of thorns on his head. This Juce Franco, with his own hands seized the bleeding boy by the arm, cut open his side with a knife, and took out his heart. Then he beat him and tore his flesh in memory and vituperation of the Sacred Passion of Jesus Christ our Redeemer, uttering curses and insults on the Person of Christ as though He were actually on the Cross. And while they were flogging the said youth, they said to him: “This traitor and deceiver, when he preached, spoke lies against the Law of God and the Law of Moses.”

“Now you will pay for the things you said and did in that ancient time. You thought you would abase us and exalt yourself, for which you shall suffer even more evil than this. You thought you would destroy us, but we will destroy you. Crucify him. crucify him —this dog, this swindler, this
deceiver, and bewitcher! He called himself King of the Jews. But he was a mere man, like any other, a bastard born in adultery, the son of a corrupt and adulterous woman. He tried to destroy the Jews and their Law, but it is he who will be destroyed by us, for coming to turn the Jews into Christians
with his deceptions and witchcraft.” These words and vituperations this Juce Franco and the other Jews first taught to these Christians [Marranos], who then imitated these Jews in the same manner, repeating the same vituperations and others of the same kind. And after the child had been
tortured and crucified by this Juce Franco and the others, they killed him, took him down from the Cross, and took him away and secretly buried him that same night where no one could find him. Some days later this Jew, Juce Franco, and all his other accomplices in this crime, met together secretly in the same cave, where they performed certain conjuring and experiments in witchcraft with the heart of the dead boy and a consecrated Communion wafer. They performed these conjurings with the perverted and diabolical intention of making the Inquisitors against heretical depravity together with all other Christians go mad and die of madness, and of subverting, and destroying and killing the Holy Faith of Jesus.”

Longhurst, John Edward. “The Ritual Murder of La Guardia,” The Age of Torquemada. The Library of Iberian Resources Online, XI: 149-152:


“If Auschwitz is true, it represents human suffering that is incomparably greater than that of Christ... Auschwitz is the denial of Christ.” Claude Lanzmann, Les Temps Modernes, Paris, December 1993, page 133

Holocaust fundamentalists even want to replace Jesus Christ the King at His Judgment Seat: “When each of us stands before the Six Million, we will be asked what we did with our lives.” Simon Wiesenthal’s magazine *Response*, Vol. 20, No. 1

“The Holocaust is a divine mystery whose secrets are reserved for a priesthood of survivors.” Elie Wiesel quoted in Peter Novick, *The Holocaust in American Life*, 1999, pp. 211-212.

Judea Declares War on Germany:


“The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany…” Valadimir Jabotinsky (founder of the Jewish terrorist group, Irgun Zvai Leumi), in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934, (also quoted in *Histoire de l'Armée Allemande* by Jacques Benoist-Mechin, Vol. IV, p. 303)

Interviewer: How can you say it wasn't a lie? It wasn't true and you know it's not true.

Rosenblat: Yes, it's not true, but in my imagination it was true. 


Professor David O'Connell also published a well-documented study of Elie Wiesel's "eyewitness" lies. For his effort, the Holocaust Fundamentalists attempted to have him fired.:

The Torah has a long tradition of lying victimhood. For example, note the typically ridiculous self-reports of victimhood in tractate Gittin of the Torah, the 4 billion (yes, billion) Jews killed by the Romans [Gittin 57b claims Vespasian killed “four hundred thousand myriads” = 400,000 x 10,000 = 4 BILLION] and the 64 million Jewish children skewered and burned in scrolls by the Romans in one city alone [Gittin 58a claims “400 synagogues” each with “400 teachers” and “400 pupils” for each teacher” = 400 x 400 x 400 = 64 million].

Even today the rabbis speak approvingly of Hitler's work as divine retribution. Revealingly, the rabbis have been saying approving things about Hitler and his "holocaust" for half a century, Chabad Lubavitch Grand Rabbi (and erstwhile "Messiah") Schneerson among them [Yehuda Bauer, "God as
surgeon." Haaretz, June 1, 2007]:

www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/865718.html www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/868474.html

Rabbi Elizer Schach, founder of the "Israeli" Shas Party: "Does anyone here think that before the holocaust, which exacted such a terrible price and left no family untouched all the Jews of Europe were righteous, God-fearing folk? There was a drift away from our faith and way of life. What happened was divine retribution for the accumulated weight of years of drifting away
from Judaism." Mordecai Richter, National Post (Canada), August 26, 2000.

"Israeli" Rabbi Ovadia Yosef stated that those who died in the Nazi persecutions were "reincarnated sinners" who got what they deserved, that Hitler "was simply the messenger of God sent to give the Jewish people their just desserts." Jack Katzenell, "Rabbi Says Holocaust Victims Were
Reincarnations of Sinners." The Independent (UK), August 6, 2000:


“You and your f@#king Jesus can kiss my a$%....We killed Jesus and we’re
proud of it...” :


“We killed Jesus and we’ll kill you too!”: 


February 25, 1994 Kach Party terrorist Baruch Goldstein uses assault rifle to murder 39 Palestinians worshipping at Cave of the Patriarchs mosque in Hebron, rabbis praise his actions and then Prime Minister Yitshak Rabin gives permission for a memorial to honor Goldstein:


February 27, 1994 Israeli Mossad bombs Our Lady of Deliverance Maronite Catholic Church at Jounieh, Lebanon, 11 killed.

April 8, 2002 et seq., bombardment of the Church of the Nativity, Bethlehem, the only major church in the Holy Land that had survived intact from the early Christian period

November 24, 2004 “Captain R” murdered a 13-year old Palestinian girl, Iman Alhamas, by pulverising her little body with some 20 bullets as she lay on the ground. ‘We should kill even three year old children, too, he said to his soldiers.’ A military court actually gave him some $20,000 as an
encouragement bonus, and he was promoted to the rank of major. He enjoyed coming back to Gaza, he told Ma'ariv newspaper: 

March 23, 2005 Israel's Sex Trade Escalating by Kevin Hechtkopf, CBS News, Jerusalem:

November 18, 2006 Swedish human rights worker beaten, 5 Palestinians
(including a 3-year-old child) beaten and stoned while the assailants chanted, “We killed Jesus and we’ll kill you too!”:

May 30, 2007 Former Sephardi Chief Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu announces “absolutely no moral prohibition against the indiscriminate killing of civilians.” His son, Chief Rabbi of Safed Schmuel Eliyahu added, "If they don't stop after we kill 100, then we must kill a thousand," said Shmuel
Eliyahu. "And if they do not stop after 1,000 then we must kill 10,000. If they still don't stop we must kill 100,000, even a million. Whatever it takes to make them stop: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1180527966693&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

January 20, 2008 Israelis admit to assassinations:

May 20, 2008 Orthodox Jewish youths burn New Testament: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/985362.html

July 29, 2009 “Far-rightists urge IDF draftees to cover up abuse of Palestinians” by Anshel Pfeffer, Haaretz:

September 11, 2009 Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv publishes The Complete Guide to Killing Non-Jews by Roi Sharon. An English translation is here:

November 2, 2009 Settlements are fertile ground for Jewish terror by Gideon Levy, Haaretz Correspondent. “…[serial killer Yaakov “Jack” ] Teitel had an organized, all-embracing worldview: Death to Arabs, homosexuals, Christians, leftists, and Messianic Jews….”:

November 24, 2009 Rabbi Yitzhak Shapiro publishes book funded by the Israeli government endorsing the killing of children and infants:

"The Jew is the living testimony of the disappearance of the State based on
theological principles (Christendom), that State which the Anti-Semites hope to restore. From the day a Jew first occupied a public office, the Christian State was in danger. That is perfectly accurate and the Anti-Semites who say that the Jews have destroyed the correct idea of the State could more justly assert that the entrance of Jews into Christian Society has symbolized the destruction of the State, I mean, of course, the Christian State." (Bernard Lazare, L'Antisemititisme, p. 361).

"It's a Trick, We Always Use It." (calling people "antisemitic"):