Some Questionable Sites (IMO)

1. Citizen Free Press. Some good stuff. They don't allow much in the way of comments now but at one time you could freely discuss the derangements of our age; but not (((who))) is pushing them. Perhaps CFP is an ADL psy-op. Jews hiding behind a false front to learn who all their enemies are - of whom, for no reason at all, there never seems to be an end of. https://citizenfreepress.com/

2. Christians for Truth. They do good work re G-d's apples, and someone there is a good writer. But they veer off into bizarre protestant heresies and misrepresent Catholicism in ways that show they're not just ignorant, they're willfully dishonest. They're also intellectual cowards. https://christiansfortruth.com/

3. The Saker. The Saker puts up some very good articles. Unfortunately, he/they imagine that makes them a power to be reckoned with. They also stubbornly adhere to certain facts and principles that are easily refuted. And NEVER say a discouraging word about Russia there! Or Putin. Ever. Perhaps the FSB is funneling rubles to them. https://thesaker.is/

4. Moon Of Alabama. MoA is an OK site if you think your opinion actually matters. But there are lots of libs lurking there. The problem with MoA is that many of the commenters don't know their butts from a hole in the ground. If you confront them re their stupidity you will soon come up on MoA's radar. I was eventually banned for doing just that. Though perhaps linking to Citizenfitz articles had something to do with it. They're also Jew friendly, which is a good indicator someone's playing for the Tribe. https://www.moonofalabama.org/

5. South Front. Some good stuff at SF - though they're overly optimistic about Russia's successes in the Russo-Ukraine war. They also allow spam porn sites to post links freely in the comments section, while people raising valid points see their comments go MIA. However, they allow criticisms of Jewry so good on them for that. https://southfront.org/

6. RT. RT is schizophrenic. Sorry but there's no other way to say it. For a while they were pushing a lot of soft porn in their pages... next to stories about Russian Orthodox monasteries. But they've mostly backed off on porn over the last couple of years. They allow some small criticisms of things Russian, but not of Putin. Their articles lack depth and context though the commenters are often intelligent and informed. RT has a bi-polar love-hate relationship with Jewry. Sometimes allowing a lot of latitude when criticizing the Tribe. Only to be followed the next week by draconian censorship of any perceived antisemitic slight. Lather, rinse, repeat.... RT gives every appearance of being a propaganda arm of the FSB. Or perhaps an NGO associated with the Russian government. In any event Sputnik is better. https://www.rt.com/


Citizenfitz