Moon madness
"It's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's been fooled." Mark Twain
Yup, they flew this pos to the Moon!
There are people who do not believe America sent men to the moon. This in spite the US government, and the MSM, being adamant that America DID go to the moon! And who remain to this day very uncharitable towards anyone who holds otherwise. "America would never lie. End of discussion!" So, why have they in fact lied? And lied brazenly?
I have a theory, my friends: MONEY. Lots and lots of money! $$$ billions USD were sunk into the Apollo program. A few thousand here and there into hands that'd never held that kind of cash before would surely gain the unconditional loyalty of a lot of people. $$$ millions more into certain other hands would have an even more profound effect. Now add to this the assistance of a certain people whose nefariousness and love of money is legendary, and who also just so happen to control large swaths of the US government, the mass media, and banking. Now add to this all the gullibles of the world and you're looking at a situation that's rife with possibilites.
As P.T. Barnum famously observed (although he never actually said it) "There's a sucker born every minute." That was in the late 1800's - nowadays there's a sucker born every second. And for every 60 suckers, a slick con man is born. We also have this irrefutable wisdom: "A fool and his money are soon parted." So, what do we have with the Apollo missions of the 60's and 70's? All the necessary ingredients for an epic hoax: $$$ billions... greed... and gullibility.
Some have argued that it'd be impossible to conceal, let alone pull off, a hoax of such magnitude. Really? There have been lots of hoaxes foisted off on the public: 911, Weapons of Mass Destruction, the Alien Autopsy video, Piltdown Man, Java Man, the Priory of Sion, the Cardiff Giant, the Holocaust, Barack Obama's birth certificate.... There have also been realities that are claimed to be hoaxes: the Israelis stealing the organs of people they've killed. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion....
In a blog like this the problems with the Apollo Moon landings are too numerous to go into in any great detail. I'm not getting a cent for any of this after all. Suffice it to say that in claims of this sort, if you can find just ONE fatal flaw in the argument, then nothing else need be addressed. 2 + 2 = 4... or it doesn't. Period. There are no other options. Likewise, the US sent men to the moon or it didn't. Period. If the Moon landing proposition contains just one fatal flaw then every other argument for or against it becomes moot. In the Aristotelean sense this is called the Law of the Excluded Middle.
The fatal flaw in the Moon landing argument is this: there.are.no.blast.craters.beneath.the.LM's.in any.of.the.moon.mission.photos.
"What?" you might ask. "The government and media are hoaxing us? What size is your tinfoil hat?" Well, my hapless friend, the blast craters HAVE to be there. But they're not....
The LM's allegedly arrived on the Moon's surface weighing roughly the equivalent of a fueled up Bell Supercobra helicopter. If any of you have stood beneath a Helicopter when it descends you know what kind of downdraft they generate. It will knock you off your feet and blow any debris away. And this with a rotor disk area of approx. 900 sq. feet... from many feet up.
The rocket nozzles beneath the LM's were about *20* sq. ft and were at most 2 feet above the moon's powdery regolith. Furthermore, the exhaust gasses exiting the nozzle would have been approx. 6,000 F. So...
WHERE ARE THE BLACKENED BLAST CRATERS BENEATH THE LM's?
Perhaps they're now living quietly in Tel Aviv?
There are many other problems associated with the farce: Rocketdyne claims they *lost the plans* for the LM's. And NASA claims they "lost" the videos of THE epic event in secular human history. Then there are no stars in any of the photos supposedly taken on the Moon. The fact that the hatches on the LM's are too small to allow a man in a space suit egress or ingress. The paid actors sitting around in "mission control". The same backgrounds cropping up in shots that were supposedly taken miles apart. Why we can't, even with forty plus years of technological advancement, duplicate today what they were supposedly able to do back in 1969.
Then there are the disappearing/reappearing/disappearing rocks as seen in numerous "Moon" photographs. The lack of a three to four second radio delay between the astronauts on the "Moon" and mission control on Earth. The one time Director of NASA, Dan Golden, saying in an interview in 1994 that before we can go to Mars we'll first need to solve the problem of the Van Allen Belt's radiation.... The US flag flapping in the Moon's "breeze". The comcal Radio Shack leftovers and cardboard and construction paper LM's.... We could go on almost forever.
Citizenfitz
When will you boys be coming back?
4 Comments:
http://mountzion144.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2127676%3ABlogPost%3A700730&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post
Dear CF,
Have you, by any chance, read this?
The Moon Landing: Fact or Fiction ?
by Germar Rudolf
http://www.vho.org/tr/2003/1/Rudolf75-81.html
Perhaps Rudolf's years in solitary confinement for questioning the so called holocaust worked on his mind. Or perhaps someone else actually wrote the article attributed to him. Not unheard of, that.
In any event the thesis that the exhaust gasses exiting the LEM's rocket nozzle at 8,000 F at approximately 3500m/sec with enough force to gently lower a 3.5 ton spacecraft so that it leaves no mark on the Moon's surface - although a footprint does - is laughable in the extreme. There are other errors in the article as well.
Citizen,
He wrote it well before his confinement experience. Anyways, just wanted to show you that great minds may be of different opinion.
How are you doing besides the +BN forum and this blog? Where do you live? It's so strange to converse with anonymous folks at the forum. You can get a feeling of age and intellectual level sometimes but not much more. Everybody is holding the cards tighr, except Joe C., Gloria and +BN, of course. Do you know anyone there by more than pseudonym? You know my address - the one for non-kosh correspondance.
HC
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home