Quo Vadis, Donald?

At one point in time, being a republican meant you still retained some sanity. Compared to the derangements of the democrats we took some solace in that... even as they marched from victory to victory.

But the powers-that-be (Satan Inc.) recognized the danger conservatives posed to their agenda and decided that the republicans had to be neutered. Co-opted really. They pursued this end with cleverness and persistence. The fruits of their labor stand before us today in the despicable "neo-con"... the phony conservative.

The neo-conservative, as embodied by the likes of Senators Lindsey Graham, Mitt Romney, the Bush's, the Cheney's, William F. Buckley, Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz... came into the light during the Reagan years, and have cursed the Earth ever since.

They became known for talking tough about communists, but being timid about confronting them. For publicly opposing abortion, and then retreating at the first hostile headline. For decrying socialized medicine, then folding on Obamacare.

In the early 2000's republicans controlled the White House and both houses of Congress. What'd they do with it? You get the idea. The only thing they seem able to muster any stomach for is kowtowing to whatever Israel demands. In their minds, in some mysterious way, that's considered "conservatism".

Say what evil you will about the democrats they do have this going for them: they actually serve the interests of their constituents.

The republican party today is the party of moral cowards and do nothings. They like to talk a lot and eat. Then talk some more. You can't shut 'em up!

And despite their claims of family values, rumor has it they are no less likely than democrats, and maybe even more so, to star in secretly recorded videos of illicit sexual shenanigans with children. I don't know how true this is, but the rumor persists.

Barring some accident or other misfortune, Donald Trump will be back in the White House this January. Does that actually mean anything? Maybe... but probably not. His first presidency was a litany of unfulfilled promises and bad omens. While it wasn't as unhappy as the past four years have been, by any objective measurement it can't be considered "good".

Politicians are narcissistic people. Trump is certainly a narcissist. An interesting study in that personality disorder for sure, but a narcissist all the same. Narcissists are among other things, moral cowards. They may step into the line of fire, but only for the photo op it presents. Not for them risking the disfavor of the fickle masses.

And Trump, as some of you might recall, was a "close friend" of Jeffrey Epstein. It's not impossible, or improbable, that the Cabal has videos of Trump doing perverse things with underage girls. Or boys for that matter. That was the rap on George HW Bush anyway: that he liked those young Black lads.

I suspect that at the Judgement, we're going to be amazed at just how many of today's "influencers" are into pedophilia... and more. It's a club (not so secret anymore) with perverse initiation and celebratory rites. And once you're in it the World becomes your paradise, and nothing is forbidden... except leaving. As Mr. Epstein discovered to his amazement.

Given his narcissism and the sleazy milieu that gave rise to his star I expect little from the second Trump presidency. His first one was an epic of underachievement. If he moves to pardon the Jan. 6 rioters the media dagger men will move in and he'll retreat. Should he try to disengage the US from the dying monster that is Ukraine, the MIC will certainly become unhappy. And being a narcissist, he'll retreat there too. Should he try to get the US out of Syria... well we saw how that played out the first time.

Same with striking a peace deal with Russia.

As for doing something about the out of control American societal locomotive and the broken bridge down the tracks we're speeding towards? Not even with both houses of Congress and the US judiciary behind him.

Of course I'm speculating in this. But I've been right often enough that I just assume it automatically. And if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.

And for yours and my sake, I hope I am wrong.

Fitz

All Heresy Begins Below the Waist

I like to visit Wikipedia and correct some of the mistakes and deceptions - grammatical, historical and philosophical one often finds there; e.g., changing “BCE” to BC. And “CE” to AD, etc. Unfortunately, the political values seen at Wikipedia are displayed in full 3D now: it is a woke propaganda outlet.

Not everywhere, and not equally, but in things that the cabal considers important Wikipedia reliably follows the party line.

I’ve noticed this too when reading articles on and surrounding the so-called “reformation”. You might not suspect Wikipedia of having any interest in falsifying the history there, but they do.

Martin Luther for one, obtains quite generous terms from Wikipedia. His vices are ignored, or downplayed, while his virtues receive excess praise. I know more about Luther than many others. He was no hero. He was a violent and vicious person plain and simple.

It is a curious fact that protestants don’t know that much about him... and the little they do know is usually wrong. Nailing his "ninety-five theses" on the church door in Wittenberg for example.

This isn’t surprising though because as a rule protestants know little about Church history. Or even that of their own particular sects; much preferring to profess the "Bible alone!" - which they then proceed to deform in thousands of strange ways. Don't believe me? OK, why are there so many protestant sects?

Anyway, the legend of Luther, repeated in Wikipedia and elsewhere, contains more than a few errors, distortions… and outright falsehoods. Not unlike Luther himself. One incident in his life is especially worth pondering.

In the late 1530’s, Philip I, the Landgrave of Hesse, was quite taken by one of his wife’s ladies in waiting. A seventeen year old girl named Margarethe, who was eighteen years younger than him.

Not content with merrily fornicating with her, Philip wondered why he shouldn’t be able to take her for his wife also. After all, the OT patriarchs often had more than one wife. Why not him? He was the Landgrave of Hesse after all. So he asked Luther his opinion.

Luther prevaricated. Bigamy was a dangerous notion back then, even among Lutherans. But Philip was very persistent and Luther badly needed his support, so eventually he quietly gave him the permission he was looking for.

Philip quickly married the girl and began parading about with a wife on each arm. This caused a stink, even in Germany, and when he was asked who told him he could have two wives Philip answered: “Luther!”

Luther was in a predicament. His reputation, maybe his freedom... his life even... were at stake. So, he did something his new religion allowed… he lied. Saying he never countenanced bigamy.

However, Philip then produced the letter Luther had written him giving consent to the bigamous marriage. Luther was forced back on his heels. But ever the rebel against honesty he declared that when "permission is given privately it must be denied publicly."

When I added that bit of information to the Wikipedia whitewash about the incident it was swiftly reverted.

Perhaps you too are getting donation pleas from Wikipedia. Don’t do it. They’re not honest. Regretfully, I’ve sent them money a few times in the past.

But that was then.

Fitz

Propaganda and Clouded Minds

                                        This shit worked!

Say what you will, the Jews have long known the value of propaganda and the mass media.

Years ago I knew an ancient German-American woman. Her family had come over a few years before WW1. She told me how their friends and neighbors turned on them “almost overnight” after the Lusitania was sunk.

They were given the cold shoulder, or verbally harrassed, sometimes angrily, by people who just a few weeks before had been friendly towards them.

Lots of German-Americans at the time changed their names to something less German, more “British”, sounding (e.g., Jantzen to Johnson or Kohl to Cole) or they would say they were from Denmark, to avoid the stigma associated with being German. Why the sudden sea change? Propaganda, my ni**as.

So yeah, propaganda is a very useful tool for changing people’s mental gears. I blogged once about "girls before and after college". The makeover there can be dramatic. Inquiring minds know how women in particular have been zeroed in on by the media. Another victory for the propagandists.

Organized Jewry and all its battalions have been activated to serve Satan. And there's no denying they have been very successful. Especially the propaganda branch.

There’s a saying that’ll be familiar to Catholics here: “Sin clouds the intellect.” The Jews know this too, which is why they've taken it to the next level. And which is why you can always find them close at hand whenever anything sinful is going down... like porn. Not to mention rigged scales, counterfeiting, false advertising, the lying mass media, election fraud, etc.…

However, allow me to repeat something I hope will become axiomatic: the real problem isn’t all the bad Jews... it’s all the bad Christians.

The Synagogue of Satan (SoS) would never have achieved its great success if Christians had been doing the little that God asks of them. Sadly, today prayer has taken a back seat to porn. And the Bible to Babylon. Due to our frantic and chronic sinning our intellects have become clouded indeed. Socked in really.

And it’s looking more and more like a Category 6 reality storm is coming our way – in some haste.

It's prayer and fasting time, folks. For yourselves, your families, your friends and your neighbors. Those of you who've somehow found your way here should know that better than most.

“For where there is no prayer and fasting there are the demons.” – St. Theophan the Recluse

Fitz

Cackling Kamala Kills It!

It isn't enough for the deranged woman to go after innocent human beings... nope, she also gots a thrill to kill endangered species: https://www.theinteldrop.org/2024/09/26/diplomatic-hunt-vp-kamala-harris-shot-and-killed-a-critically-endangered-black-rhino-in-zambia-in-2023/

Between Asian herbalists and demented women there aren't many Black Rhinos left in the known universe: https://www.helpingrhinos.org/black-rhino/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwyL24BhCtARIsALo0fSBJ9ynuXgppMznovLOAD-a3J92uhQ3KD9qecH5U9zm4WYWnPDPe1LQaAr3xEALw_wcB

But Kamala belongs to a highly protected species herself. She's Black too... sort of.

Not to mention being a woman and a politician.

She hits the trifecta in America's politically protected species sweepstakes!

However, there's a danger in it for her too: because some billionaire might decide her mounted head would look good above the mantle at his hunting lodge.

I have to disagree with the people who think that if the story gets traction, it'll doom her politically.

Nope, it won’t hurt her at all. How do I know this?

Because her constituency is too far gone, too brainwashed, for it to dissuade them from voting for her. In fact, they’ll find in it even more reason for supporting her. When her ni**as read the headline: “Kamala saved a rhino from dying a slow, painful death due to climate change and habitat loss!” they'll get onboard with it.

Guaranteed.

Fitz

You Will...

Sometimes hear people who should know better say: "God doesn't send anyone to hell. People send themselves to hell." Well... not so fast there, bucky!

God certainly does send people to hell: "Fear Him, who can destroy body and soul in hell." - Matt 10:28. And: "As for these enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them, bring them here and kill them in front of me." - Luke 19:27

Any ambiguousness there?

Then there are all the stories of people who suffered NDE's and got the bad news from the Almighty Himself.

Ultimately people go to hell because that's what they choose. It's what they lived... and God simply delivers their sentences. And the sentences are final. Eternity. No early release. No probation. No parole.

There are only two finalities: Heaven and hell.

Those who reject one must necessarily have the other.

Fitz

Is Russia "Bogged Down" in Ukraine?

                                    Battle lines, Fall 2022

                                 Battle lines, August 2024

I don’t believe Russia is bogged down. I believe it’s deliberate. Things could have ended in Ukraine in a few weeks, if Putin wanted that, by doing two simple things:

1. Wrecking Kiev’s power grid.

2. Taking out the bridges over the Dniepr carrying men and weapons to the front.

End of problem.

Instead, two years seven months later and there’s still no end in sight; and the front when, it has moved, has usually moved in Ukraine's favor. And in an action NO ONE SAW COMING, Ukraine invaded and occupied nearly 500 sq/mi of Russia. And two months later shows little inclination to leave; or of being made to leave.

I think the “bog” is Putin. The Tribe got to him in some way. That or he has a mental disorder… and sees himself as some grandiose god of war, who can win while doing the exact opposite of the one thing warfare demands, and has always demanded: speed of movement.

Personally, I believe the Tribe got to him.

Fitz

Nothing New Under the Sun

For some reason I've been accused of being "antisemitic". I don't know why. I have nothing at all against a family of Middle Eastern languages. Am I an "anti-Jewite" then? Nope. I'm not an "anti-Jewite" either. A better term for my position would be to say I'm "anti-kike".

I have nothing against Jews. I've known quite a few in my time and as a rule got along well with them. I appreciate not having to dumb things down for them. Maybe they feel the same way.

And there've been times when Jews helped me out, even though there was absolutely nothing in it for them.

Plus, though they don't like to forget or forgive, on the flip side, if you go out of your way to help a Jew, they will notice it. And they'll remember it too. Better than we do.

Talking about "The Day of the Rope" for Jews, or anyone else, is foolishness. God clearly still wants them around - even though they've gone off the reservation. At the end of the World Jews have an important role to play in Satan's final defeat. There are Christian prophecies regarding this.

The real problem is Satan's sidekicks: the kikes. Running around and stirring up s*** among the goyim. Same as always. Then running back to the other Jews, screaming "See how they hate us!" and getting them all worked up. Eventually, the Jew killers show up to say "Hi!" Of course by then, the guilty kikes have long since skedaddled. Leaving the inoffensive Jews to face the wrath of the mob.

Apparently if there were only two Jews left in the whole wide world, one of them would have to be a kike. Some kind of unwritten law I think. Bad for us. Bad for Jews. So, for now at least, we're stuck with the kikes. A punishment decreed from on high for our many sins.

Looking ahead to what is coming our way, my humble advice dear reader, is to pray and fast a lot. For yourselves, your families, your friends.... And even for Jews.

Some do come over to Christ. Look at Brother Nathanael Kapner. Look at Dr. Bernard Nathanson (that one came out of the clear blue!). Look at Bobby Fisher. Look at Dr. James Tour. Look at Dr. Mortimer Adler... Edith Stein... Felix Mendelssohn... Shia Leboeuf... Cardinal Lustiger... Siegfried Sassoon... Gustave Mahler... Dutch Schultz... Robert Novak... Boris Pasternak... Fr. Alphonse Ratisbonne... Rabbi Israel Zolli... and on and on.

I can promise that in every one of those conversion stories, a Christian... someone... somewhere... had prayed for that individual.

We too should remember to pray for Jews. In an unexpected way it secretly gladdens them to think that someone out there is praying on their behalf. Anyway, pick a Jew you like, surely there is someone, and pray for them. Even if just fifteen seconds a day.

You'll get a lot of credit for it at the Resurrection.

Fitz